Lord Byron as a satirist in verseFuess, Claude Moore
History
Lord Byron as a satirist in verse
Fuess, Claude Moore
Byron, George Gordon Byron, Baron, 1788-1824 -- Criticism and interpretation; Verse satire, English -- History and criticism
In the first canto a visit to Cintra leads Byron into an indictment of
the Convention of Cintra (1808), signed by Kellerman and Wellesley,
by the terms of which the French troops in Portugal were permitted to
evacuate with artillery, cavalry, and equipment. This agreement was
regarded by the home officials as equivalent to treason, and the men
responsible were subjected to some rigorous criticism. Byron took the
popular side of the question in saying,
“Ever since that martial synod met,
Brittannia sickens, Cintra, at thy name.”[172]
This patriotic mood seems, however, to have been a passing one. In
after years he was not inclined to take the part of his country. Of
a different sort are the stanzas on a London Sunday[173] which, in
Moore’s opinion, disfigure the poem. Canto I has also some satiric
animadversions upon women, notably the lines,
“Maidens, like moths, are ever caught by glare,
And Mammon wins his way where Seraphs might despair.”[174]
In the final version of the first two cantos some stanzas of a satiric
tone were omitted, among them lines on Frere, Carr, and Wellesley in
Canto I, and passages on Elgin, Hope, Gell, and the “gentle Dilettanti”
in Canto II.
A few ephemeral verses of this period still remain unnoticed: an
occasional epistle in rhyme to Moore or Murray; four brief squibs on
Lord Thurlow’s poetry; and several unimportant epigrams on trivial
subjects. No one of them is significant as literature, and they may
well be passed by without comment.
In a last glance at Byron’s satiric production from 1811 to 1818 we
perceive that, with the single exception of _Hints from Horace_, an
avowed imitation, his work was directed towards definite ends. He was
little given to vague denunciation; on the contrary, in touch as he was
with current events and a keen observer of what was going on around
him, he aimed, in his satire, at specific evils and follies. It is
interesting, too, that most of his work after his return from abroad
was journalistic and transitory, hastily conceived and carelessly
composed. At the same time there are signs of a change in spirit.
Though he still continues to burst out into invective on provocation,
he is beginning to recognize the value of humor and mockery. More and
more he is employing new metrical forms, and neglecting the heroic
couplet for freer and more varied measures.
When Byron left England in 1816, he had been taught much by experience
and had acquired some maturity of judgment. To some extent, though
not entirely, he had outgrown the affectation and morbid pessimism of
his boyhood. In a stern school he had learned many lessons, and, as a
result, his satire from the time of his voluntary exile until his death
displays a different spirit. When at last he discovered an artistic
form and style in which to embody it, it showed a decided gain in merit
and originality over _English Bards_, which, in 1817, was still the
best satire he had written.
CHAPTER VII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account