Lord Byron as a satirist in verseFuess, Claude Moore
History
Lord Byron as a satirist in verse
Fuess, Claude Moore
Byron, George Gordon Byron, Baron, 1788-1824 -- Criticism and interpretation; Verse satire, English -- History and criticism
_A Sketch_, containing 104 lines in heroic couplets, is a coarse and
scurrilous attack on Mrs. Clermont, beginning with a short account of
her life,
“Born in the garret, in the kitchen bred,
Promoted thence to deck her mistress’ head,”
and closing with a terrible imprecation,
“May the strong curse of crush’d affections light
Back on thy bosom with reflected blight!
And make thee, in thy leprosy of mind,
As loathsome to thyself as to mankind!”
Perhaps no more savage satire was ever levelled at a woman; it is
even more venomous than Pope’s assault on Lady Montagu in what Mr.
Birrell calls “the most brutal lines ever written by man of woman.”
Murray wrote Byron, after showing the satire to Rogers, Canning, and
Frere:--“They have all seen and admired the lines; they agree that you
have produced nothing better; that satire is your forte; and so in each
class as you choose to adopt it.”[171] These men, however, were active
supporters of Byron, and their praise seems extravagant. Whatever his
provocation may have been--and it was probably great--Byron did not
enhance his fame by this barbarous tirade.
In the very midst of his anger the poet pauses in the poem to pay his
wife a tribute and to assert his love for her; but not long after he
turned to assail Lady Byron herself. Indeed he is said to have attached
an epigram to the deed of separation,
“A year ago you swore, fond she!
‘To love, to honour,’ and so forth:
Such was the vow you pledged to me,
And here’s exactly what ’tis worth.”
In September, 1816, when he was in Switzerland, he wrote the _Lines on
Hearing that Lady Byron Was Ill_, in which he fairly gloats over her in
her sickness. No one can mistake the meaning of the line,
“I have had many foes, but none like thee,”
or of the charge,
“Of thy virtues didst thou make a vice,
Trafficking with them in a purpose cold,
For present anger and for future gold.”
These stanzas, however, were not printed until 1832. In the meantime
Byron had continued the attack on his wife in _Childe Harold_, III,
117, and IV, 130–138, in _Don Juan_, and in an occasional short epigram
sent to friends in England. There can be no doubt that as the years
went by and his attempts at reconciliation were thwarted, he grew
thoroughly embittered against her.
Byron’s habits of thought were so frequently satirical that it was
natural for him to introduce satire even into poems which were
obviously of a different character. In his preface to _Childe Harold_
he announced his intention of following Beattie in giving full rein to
his inclination, and being “either droll or pathetic, descriptive or
sentimental, tender or satirical” as the mood came to him. In that poem
the moralizing and didactic elements often closely approach satire,
and there are some passages of genuine invective, a few of which have
already been indicated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account