Churchill, Randolph Henry Spencer, Lord, 1849-1895
‘I sympathise with you very heartily,’ replied Lord Salisbury late the
same night. ‘But what can I do? It is not a case where advice would be
of any service. In fact, I sometimes think my advice does more harm than
good; for, if only partially followed, it may produce exactly the
reverse of the intended effect. I hope the papers will attribute the
collapse to our exalted patriotism. At least, that is the only hope with
which one can console oneself.’
Lord Randolph wrote again:--
_Private and Confidential._
Carlton Club: April 28, 1885.
Dear Lord Salisbury,--I have been thinking of nothing else but the
events of last night in the House of Commons and, encouraged by
your kind note received this morning, I venture to inflict upon you
another letter.
The tone of the Metropolitan Press this morning is not unfavourable
to us; but the Metropolitan Press is most misleading. I see every
day the provincial Press, and I know well how in their London
correspondence and in their articles they will magnify the personal
triumph of Mr. Gladstone. He had been running down for some time,
but has now, _for the time_, completely recovered his old position
by the extraordinary and unprecedented _coup_ he carried off last
night. That _coup_ has done us, as a party, more real harm with the
constituencies than any event in this Parliament which I can
remember. This sort of thing did not matter in 1880; but we are now
within six months of a General Election, and any event which
greatly elevates the Liberals and depresses our own people has a
terrible effect. That triumph of last night will be repeated unless
very decided and energetic steps are taken now. The personal
ascendency of Mr. Gladstone is our great difficulty. If we can
destroy or mitigate that, we gain adherents. I know what the little
Fourth Party did in ‘80 and ‘81 and what support and sympathy they
acquired in the country on that account. That old Fourth Party has
disappeared; but the time has come when another body of the same
nature, but on much better and weightier lines, might be formed,
and might effect astonishing Parliamentary success.
I quite perceive that anything in the nature of open revolt against
Sir S. N. would be fatal in every way. At the same time _it is
madness_ to blind yourself to the fact that whatever abilities he
once possessed for guiding a party are utterly gone and that his
influence upon the vigour and vitality of the party now enervates
and enfeebles; and _that_ at a moment when the greatest possible
party life and vigour is a matter of life and death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account