Churchill, Randolph Henry Spencer, Lord, 1849-1895
I have suggested to Sir Michael Hicks-Beach that he should remain
permanently in town for the remainder of the Session and should be
always in the House of Commons when it is sitting; and I have told
him that if he can pledge himself to this, I believe a certain
number of M.P.’s would pledge themselves to be always at his back.
I allude principally to the old Fourth Party, to Raikes and
Chaplin, to Dyke and Gibson, and to one or two more very talented
and ambitious young members of the party. The effect of the
constant attendance and skilful action of such a body night after
night upon the Government cannot be over-estimated. It might lead
them to throw up the sponge, either by one or more unexpected
defeats. But, in any case, it would keep our party in the country
alive and in good heart and should supply them with endless topics
for local controversy. It is absolutely essential that some member
of real position and influence upon the Front Bench should be at
the head of such a combination. The weakness of the old Fourth
Party was that they had no _point d’appui_; they were always a body
of skirmishers altogether _en l’air_. And yet House of Commons
history would be altogether misread if their disintegrating effect
upon the Liberal party was underestimated or ignored. To show you
what might have been done last night, I have ascertained from so
reliable a source as Lord R. Grosvenor that all the elements of the
Courtney faction and the Labouchere faction might have been let
loose last night, if only Sir S. N. had not weakly yielded to an
evanescent impression created by Gladstone’s gingerbread rhetoric,
and allowed the debate to collapse. I think under high persuasion
Sir M. Hicks-Beach would be prepared to make great sacrifices and
run some personal risks, and it is for that reason that I bring all
these matters to your notice. I may, without overmuch presumption,
claim some little authority on these party interests. My letters to
the _Times_ in 1882 and my article in the _Fortnightly_ clearly
foretold the ultimate effect of Sir S. N.’s leadership. They
brought much odium upon me at the time and may indeed have
embarrassed persons I wished not to embarrass, but my word has been
justified by events and by present public opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account