Churchill, Randolph Henry Spencer, Lord, 1849-1895
I assume Salisbury ‘accepts the commission’; of course he will
offer you office. If there be any definite measure--say the Crimes
Act--which he insists upon and you object to, you will be quite
justified in refusing office. For you will have a justification
which you can make public, and everyone will give you credit for
having acted according to your principles and conscience. But if
your reasons are indefinite--say, for instance, because you cannot
obtain a declaration in favour of a Liberal Toryism--you will have
no explanation to give which the public will ever be able to
understand. Between this and November no policy can be carried into
effect by legislation, and so it is scarcely possible that any
difference existing between the Salisbury Tories and yourself could
be brought to a practical issue. And so, if you now refuse office
on theoretical grounds which you can never explain, you will obtain
the credit amongst the whole Tory party of having plotted against
Salisbury and of having prevented him and them from coming into
office. It will be time enough for you to fight the battle of Tory
Democracy when some action (by way of legislation or
administration) is taken adverse to the principles you hold.
Surely you ought to be catholic _now_, and let all shades of
Toryism enjoy a gleam of success. If you do not, you will much
endanger the cause of ‘Tory Democracy’; for although you can at any
time be the leader of a Democracy, your power with the Tory element
will be sadly shaken.
Ever yours,
H. J.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account