Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792 — John Shaqi
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792Dumas, Alexandre
History
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792
Dumas, Alexandre
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
The elder was called Jacques Dinant. I don’t know what has since
become of him. The other was Félicién Herda, afterwards a celebrity
in the Revolution.
This latter was a young man—fair, of a light complexion—a regular
child of Paris—irritable, and as nervous as a woman. The nickname
which his comrades gave him, as his irritability was always dragging
him into controversy, and as he used always to say “No” to every
theory, was “Citizen Veto.”
Need I say that the veto was the prerogative of the King, and that it
was through his wrong use of this privilege on two occasions that he
alienated his people.
Madame Duplay appeared from the kitchen, with the first course. I was
presented to her; but she paid even less attention to me than her two
daughters had done.
She was about thirty-eight or forty years of age, and must, at one
time, have been beautiful, but with those coarse and too matured
charms common to the lower orders of the people.
She shared all the patriotic opinions of her husband, and was, like
him, an ardent admirer of Robespierre.
There was a discussion during supper concerning the relative merits
of the Jacobin leaders, in which the apprentices took part as equals
of their master.
I fancied, somehow, that Félicién Herda regarded me with an evil
eye. As the stranger, I had the seat of honor next to Mademoiselle
Cornelie; and I think he must have looked upon it as an encroachment
on his privileges.
Although well read in antiquity, I was profoundly ignorant of modern
politics, and this gained me the pity of M. Duplay.
I knew the name of the famous Club of Jacobins, where Monsieur passed
his patriotic evenings, but of all else I was ignorant.
From that bed of aristocratic Jacobins of ’89, one could not foretell
the springing up of the terrible and popular Jacobins of ’93.
Robespierre alone appeared, but he began to assume that pale and
impassible visage which was never forgotten, if once seen.
Duplay promised to take me to the Jacobins, and to show me him who
was known among them by the title of an “honest man.”
Robespierre had, as yet, but on two occasions spoken; and he had
obtained the name of the “Timon of public affairs.”
I know not if it was the view of Robespierre, whom I saw that night
for the first time, that engraved the words on my mind, but I know
this—that, in sixty years, I have not forgotten one word of his
biography, or one lineament of his face.
I feel that I could draw his portrait now, as life-like as when he
appeared first to me, on the platform, preparing to address us; and,
from that time to the end, I was his most devoted admirer.
Robespierre was born in 1758, in that old, sombre, ecclesiastical and
judicial town of Arras, capital of Artois, a province of France only
150 years, and where may yet be seen the ruins of the immense palace
of its King-Bishop.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account