“The Genius” was the title of the play. Its protagonist had come home
after completing his education in Vienna; and there was the family
gathered to greet him. Mr. Hartman, the father, was a wholesale
grocer--a business large enough to have brought wealth, but painfully
tainted with “commonness”. Then there was Mrs. Hartman, stout and
tightly-laced, who had studied the science of elegance while her husband
studied sugar. There was the elder son, who under his mother’s guidance
had married well; and Miss Violet Hartman, who was looking up to the
perilous heights of a foreign alliance.
Only of late had the family come to realize what an asset to their
career this “Genius” might be. They had humored him in his strange whim
to devote his life to fiddling; money had been spent on him freely--he
brought home with him a famous Cremona instrument for which three
thousand dollars had been paid. But now it was dawning upon them
that this was an “ugly duckling”; he was to make his _début_ in the
metropolis, where an overwhelming triumph was expected; and then he
would return to the home city in the middle West, and would play at
_musicales_, which even the most exclusive of the “_élite_” must attend.
There was also the great Prof. Reminitsky, the teacher who had made
Lloyd, and had come to New York with him; and there was the Herr Prof.
von Arne, of the University of Berlin, a world-renowned psychiatrist,
author of “The Neurosis of Inspiration”. The Herr Professor had come
to America to make some studies for his forthcoming masterpiece on the
religious mania; and he was glad to see his old friend Reminitsky, whose
seventeen-year-old musical prodigy was most interesting material for
study.
Prof. Reminitsky was the world’s greatest authority in the art of
tearing the human soul to pieces by means of horse-hair rubbed with
resin and scraped over the intestines of a pig. There were no tricks of
finger-gymnastics and of tone-production that he had not mastered.
As for the emotions produced thereby, he felt them, but in a purely
professional way; that is, the convictions he had concerning them
related to their effects upon audiences, and more especially upon
the score or two of critical experts whose psychology had been his
life-study. But having studied also the psychology of youth, he knew
that his _protégé_ must needs have other convictions concerning his
performances. This was his supreme greatness--that he understood the
paranoia of enthusiasm, and used this understanding to tempt his pupils
to new heights of achievement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account