In conclusion, I will say a few words about the name. In the facsimile
copy of Domesday it is Lothu Wistoft. In the grant of the privileges of
“Ancient Demesne” by Elizabeth, which recites a certificate from Chancery
that the parish was in demesne of the Crown in the time of William the
Conqueror the name is spelt “Lothn-wistoft.” Either spelling affords
good evidence of the origin of the word, and leaves little room for
doubting its etymology. Lothu-wistoft or Lothn-wistoft was the “toft” by
Loth-wis or Lothen-wis, or Lothing-wis, “wis” being the same word as
“ouse,” a word used in Saxon times as an equivalent for “lake,” as in
Wisbech, stagnant or slow moving water, as distinguished from a quick
running river. The place was probably at first only called “toft,” a
very common word in Saxon times, denoting a small homestead, and not
uncommonly found in existing names—as “Toft Monks,” “Stowlangtoft,” &c.
“Loth-wis” or “Lothn-wis” was equivalent to “Lothing Lake,” the piece of
water which played the important part of separating Lothing, or
Lothingland, from the rest of the county of Suffolk. The abbreviation of
this long word into a shorter form was inevitable, and as early as 1327
we find it appearing in the Subsidy Rolls as “Lowystofth.” The forms it
took after this time are multitudinous, but the later abbreviations and
corruptions, due to vulgar pronunciations and bad spelling, are no guide
whatever to its original etymology Lothing or Lothingland, Lothingaland,
Loddingland, Luddingland—was the “ing” or property of Loth, Lod, or Lud,
probably a Danish captain, to whom this district was given by the Danish
conquerors of East Anglia after it had been settled in townships by the
Angles (compare Kessingland, &c.)
LECTURE II.
PART I.—LOWESTOFT IN THE 14th CENTURY.—RISE AND FALL OF YARMOUTH.
PART II.—RISE OF LOWESTOFT.—PARLIAMENTARY WAR WITH YARMOUTH.
PART III.—THE LAY SUBSIDIES.
PART I.—LOWESTOFT IN THE 14TH CENTURY.
Lowestoft lies hid in oblivion for some 300 years after her appearance in
Domesday. During this time great changes had taken place in the country
at large as well as in Lowestoft. A new regime had been established,
under which Saxon and Angle, Dane and Norman, had been welded into one
nation, and laws and institutions were in force, which are familiar
features in our present legal and political system. Although still 500
years from the present time, England, in Edward III.’s reign, was much
more like the England of to-day than the country described in Domesday.
Foreign trade had sprung up. Wheat and wool were grown in large
quantities and exported from Yarmouth and other ports. The penny was no
longer the only silver coin, and gold coins of several different sizes
and values were in circulation. Last, and not least, the herring fishery
was being carried on to a very large extent on this coast, and was an
object of national and international importance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account