Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
“Nevertheless, these descriptions are not mere fancies, but they are
based upon historical facts, and upon information received from
sources whose nature will be plain to every occultist. The events
described have all actually taken place; but whether they have
wholly or in part taken place on the external or internal plane,
each intelligent reader is left to decide for himself.”
=CORRESPONDENCE=
INTERESTING TO ASTROLOGERS.
ASTROLOGICAL NOTES—No. 2.
_To the Editor of_ LUCIFER.
The ancients assigned to the planets certain signs and degrees, in
which they were essentially dignified, being there more powerful for
good, and less powerful for evil; these were called their House,
Exaltation, Triplicity, Term, and Face. Opposite to the first two
were the places where they were essentially debilitated, being there
less powerful for good and more powerful for evil; these were called
their Detriment and Fall. Whether the latter three dignities have
three corresponding debilities has not been stated.
To the seven known planets, the ancients apportioned the twelve
zodiacal signs as their respective houses or chief dignity, thus: ☉
ruled ♌, and ☽ ruled ♋, both by day and night; while the remaining
ten signs were divided between the remaining five planets, each
planet ruling two signs, one by day and the other by night. But when
♅ and ♆ were discovered, the question arose where to place them.
A. J. Pearce, the present editor of _Zadkiel’s Almanac_, has
suggested that, as they were more remote from ☉ than was ♄, they
should have the same houses and exaltations as ♄. Raphael dethrones
♄ from ♒, and proclaims that ♅ reigns in his stead. Both these
suggestions involve serious difficulties, nor do they settle the
question once and for all with regard to any planets which may yet
be discovered. It seems unlikely that planets of such diverse
natures as ♄, ♅, and ♆ (not to mention any still more distant
planets) should all bear equal rule in the same two signs, and to
depose ♄ from his throne, pre-supposes a grave error on the part of
the ancients, whose teaching on this point has been handed down with
complete unanimity from the dim past: necessitating, also, a further
process of dethronement, and a further ignoring of the teachings of
antiquity, as further planetary discoveries are made.
The first Raphael (the late R. C. Smith) rejected the ancient
nocturnal and diurnal division of the Houses and Triplicities, in
which he is followed by his successor. It appears to me that it is
here that the error, with its consequent difficulties, first arose;
and that by observing this distinction, ♅ and ♆ easily find their
homes, with room to spare for their yet undiscovered brethren.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account