Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
Indeed, the whole sidereal world, planets and their regents—the ancient
gods of poetical paganism—the sun, the moon, the elements, and the
entire host of incalculable worlds—those at least which happened to be
known to the Church Fathers—shared in the same fate. They have all been
slandered, all bedevilled by the insatiable desire of proving one little
system of theology—built on and constructed out of old pagan
materials—the only right and holy one, and all those which preceded or
followed it utterly wrong. Sun and stars, the very air itself, we are
asked to believe, became pure and “redeemed” from original sin and the
Satanic element of heathenism, only after the year I, A.D. Scholastics
and scholiasts, the spirit of whom “spurned laborious investigation and
slow induction,” had shown, to the satisfaction of infallible Church,
the whole Kosmos in the power of Satan—a poor compliment to God—before
the year of the Nativity; and Christians had to believe or be condemned.
Never have subtle sophistry and casuistry shown themselves so plainly in
their true light, however, as in the questions of the ex-Satanism and
later redemption of various heavenly bodies. Poor beautiful Venus got
worsted in that war of so-called divine proofs to a greater degree than
any of her sidereal colleagues. While the history of the other six
planets, and their gradual transformation from Greco-Aryan gods into
Semitic devils, and finally into “divine attributes of the _seven eyes_
of the Lord,” is known but to the educated, that of Venus-Lucifer has
become a household story among even the most illiterate in Roman
Catholic countries.
This story shall now be told for the benefit of those who may have
neglected their astral mythology.
Venus, characterised by Pythagoras as the _sol alter_, a second Sun, on
account of her magnificent radiance—equalled by none other—was the first
to draw the attention of ancient Theogonists. Before it began to be
called Venus, it was known in _pre_-Hesiodic theogony as Eosphoros (or
Phosphoros) and Hesperos, the children of the dawn and twilight. In
Hesiod, moreover, the planet is decomposed into two divine beings, two
brothers—Eosphoros (the _Lucifer_ of the Latins) the morning, and
Hesperos, the evening star. They are the children of Astrœos and Eos,
the starry heaven and the dawn, as also of Kephalos and Eos (_Theog:_
381, _Hyg: Poet: Astron_: 11, 42). Preller, quoted by Decharme, shows
Phaeton identical with Phosphoros or Lucifer (_Griech: Mythol_: 1. 365).
And on the authority of Hesiod he also makes Phaeton the son of the
latter two divinities—Kephalos and Eos.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account