Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888. — John Shaqi
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
Thus a purely astronomical personification, built upon an occult meaning
which no one has hitherto seemed to unriddle outside the Eastern wisdom,
has now become a dogma, part and parcel of Christian revelation. A
clumsy transference of characters is unequal to the task of making
thinking people accept in one and the same trinitarian group, the “Word”
or Jesus, God and Michael (with the Virgin occasionally to complete it)
on the one hand, and Mitra, Satan and Apollo-Abbadon on the other: the
whole at the whim and pleasure of Roman Catholic Scholiasts. If Mercury
and Venus (Lucifer) are (astronomically in their revolution around the
Sun) the symbols of God the Father, the Son, and of their Vicar,
Michael, the “Dragon-Conqueror,” in Christian legend, why should they
when called Apollo-_Abaddon_, the “King of the Abyss,” Lucifer, Satan,
or Venus—become forthwith devils and demons? If we are told that the
“conqueror,” or “Mercury-Sun,” or again St. Michael of the _Revelation_,
was given the spoils of the conquered angel, namely, his planet, why
should opprobrium be any longer attached to a constellation so purified?
Lucifer is now the “Angel of the Face of the Lord,”[10] because “that
face is mirrored in it.” We think rather, because the Sun is reflecting
his beams in Mercury seven times more than it does on our Earth, and
twice more in Lucifer-Venus: the Christian symbol proving again its
astronomical origin. But whether from the astronomical, mystical or
symbological aspect, Lucifer is as good as any other planet. To advance
as a proof of its demoniacal character, and identity with Satan, the
configuration of Venus, which gives to the crescent of this planet the
appearance of a cut-off horn is rank nonsense. But to connect this with
the horns of “The Mystic Dragon” in _Revelation_—“one of which was
broken”[11]—as the two French Demonologists, the Marquis de Mirville and
the Chevalier des Mousseaux, the champions of the Church militant, would
have their readers believe in the second half of our present century—is
simply an insult to the public.
-----
Footnote 10:
“Both in Biblical and pagan theologies,” says de Mirville, “the Sun
has its god, its defender, and its sacrilegious usurper, in other
words, its Ormuzd, its planet Mercury (Mitra), and its Lucifer, Venus
(or Ahriman), taken away from its ancient master, and now given to its
conqueror.” (p. 164.) Therefore, Lucifer-Venus is quite _holy_ now.
Footnote 11:
In Revelation there is no “horn broken,” but it is simply said in
Chapter XIII., 3. that John saw “one of his heads, as it were, wounded
to death.” John knew naught in his generation of “a horned” devil.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account