Luther himself spoke of him after his death, on the strength of the
reports received, and, perhaps, also from a desire to reckon him
amongst his followers, in a letter to the Nuremberg Humanist Eobanus
Hessus, as “the best of men,” and one to be congratulated “for that
Christ allowed him to die so happily after such preparation” (“_tam
instructum et beato fine_”), sparing him the sight of the evil days to
come. “Therefore may he rest in peace with his fathers, Amen.”[107]
Melanchthon says a few words of regret on the death of the great
artist, but from them nothing definite can be gathered. Venatorius,
the Lutheran preacher at Nuremberg, preached his panegyric.[108] In
his letter to Tschertte, in 1530, on the other hand, Pirkheimer counts
him, like himself, among those who were at first good Lutherans, but
were afterwards disappointed in their hopes. “The close friendship
which united Dürer to this passionate and conceited scholar, who could
not brook the slightest contradiction, is, in fact, a proof which we
must not undervalue, of a certain affinity in their views with regard
to the cardinal question of faith and religious belief.”[109] It is
not impossible that Dürer, like Pirkheimer, began to have doubts,
and withdrew at last the open support he had previously given the
Reformers.
The spiritual experiences of Pirkheimer and Dürer help to bring before
our eyes typical instances of the false paths followed by many of their
contemporaries and the struggles through which they went.
CHAPTER XII
EXCOMMUNICATION AND OUTLAWRY SPIRITUAL BAPTISM IN THE WARTBURG
1. The Trial. The Excommunication (1520) and its Consequences
ON June 15, 1520, Leo X promulgated the Bull condemning forty-one
Propositions of Luther’s teaching, and threatening the person of their
author with excommunication.[110]
The Bull was the result of a formal suit instituted at Rome on the
details of which light has been thrown in recent times by Karl Müller,
Aloys Schulte and Paul Kalkoff.[111]
The trial had taken a long time, much too long considering the state
of things in Germany; this delay was in reality due to political
causes, to the Pope’s regard for the Elector of Saxony, the
approaching Imperial Election and to the procrastination of the German
Prince-Bishops. Even before Dr. Johann Eck proceeded to Rome to promote
the case the negotiations had been resumed in the Papal Consistories
at the instance of the Italian party. The first Consistory was held on
January 9, 1520.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account