It is psychologically worth noticing that Luther, in his zeal, seems
never to have perceived that the argument might just as well be turned
against himself. The Emperor and the Catholic powers of the Empire,
with at least as much show of reason, might have urged as he did,
that no power, without being doomed to “destruction” and to being
“burnt to ashes,” could stand against the Gospel. The Gospel which
they defended was that handed down by the Church, whereas Luther’s
Evangel, to mention only one point, was novel and hitherto unheard
of by theologians and faithful laity alike. On the one occasion when
this thought occurred to him, he had the following excuse ready: We
are sure of our faith, hence we may and must demand that everything
yield to it; the Emperor and his party on the other hand have no such
assurance and can never reach it. “We know that the Emperor is not and
cannot be certain of it, because we know that he errs and seeks to
oppose the Evangel. We are not obliged to believe that he is certain
because he does not act in accordance with God’s Word, whereas we
on the other hand do; for it is his bounden duty to recognise God’s
Word!” Otherwise, Luther adds, “every murderer and adulterer might
also plead: ‘I am right, therefore you must approve my act because
I am certain I am in the right.’”[122]—“It was with arguments like
these that the Protestant Estates were to justify their overthrow
of the ancient faith and worship, and to demonstrate the wickedness
of the Emperor’s efforts to preserve the faith and worship of his
fathers.”[123]
Of the various memoranda which Luther had to draw up for his Sovereign
on the question of armed resistance, that of February 8, 1523, prepared
for the Elector Frederick, must be mentioned first.[124] In this the
Prince’s attention is drawn to the fact, that publicly he had hitherto
preserved an attitude of neutrality concerning religious questions,
and had merely given out that, as a layman, he was waiting for the
triumph of the truth. Hence it was necessary that he should declare
himself for the justice of Luther’s cause if he intended to abandon
his attitude of submission to the Imperial authority. In that case he
might have recourse to arms in the character of a stranger who comes to
the rescue, but not as a sovereign of the Empire. Further, “he must do
this only at the call of a singular spirit and faith, short of which
he must give way to the sword of the higher power and die with his
Christians.”[125] Should he, however, be attacked, not by the Emperor,
but by the Catholic Princes, then, after first attempting to bring
about peace, he must repel force by force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account