Here again he was promoting dissension, indeed, generally speaking,
his exhortations were more a hindrance than a help; again and again
he insists on entangling himself anew in his polemics against Popery,
and this in spite of the urgent needs of Germany. Led by the Pope,
the Catholic Princes have become “our tyrants,” who “imprison us,
exercise compulsion, banish and burn us, behead and drown us and treat
us worse than do the Turks.”[219]
“In short, wherever we go, the devil, our real landlord, is at home.
If we visit the Turk, we find the devil; if we remain under the rule
of the Pope, we fall into hell. There is nothing but devils on either
side and everywhere.” Thus it must be with mankind, he says, referring
to 2 Timothy iii. 1, when the world reaches its end.[220]
In “what manner I advise war on the Turk, this my booklet shall be
witness.”[221]
Cochlæus, Luther’s opponent, collected the contradictions contained
in the latter’s statements on the Turkish War, and published them in
1529 at Leipzig in the form of an amusing Dialogue. In this work one
of the characters, Lutherus, attacks the war in Luther’s own words,
the second, Palinodus, defends it, again with Lutheran phrases, whilst
an ambassador of King Ferdinand plays the part of the interested
enquirer. The work instances fifteen “contradictions.”[222]
Luther personally acted wisely, for it was of the utmost importance to
him to destroy the impression that he stood in the way of united action
against the Turks. This the Princes and Estates who protested at the
Diet of Spires were far less willing to do. They cast aside all scruple
and openly refused to lend their assistance against the Turks unless
the enactment against the religious innovations were rescinded. It is
true that Vienna was then not yet in any pressing danger, though, on
the other hand, news had been received at Spires that the Turkish fleet
was cruising off the coasts of Sicily. It was only later on in the
year, when the danger of Austria and for the German Princes began to
increase, that the Protesters showed signs of relenting. They also saw
that, just then, their refusal to co-operate would be of no advantage
to the new Church. Landgrave Philip of Hesse nevertheless persisted in
his obstinate refusal to take any part in the defence of the Empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account