The doctrine that the Mass is a renewal of the Sacrifice of Christ
“attained its fullest development in the Middle Ages”; thus Adolf
Franz at the conclusion of his work “Die Messe im deutschen
Mittelalter.” At the close of the Middle Ages it was the rule to
“direct the eyes of the faithful, during the sacrifice on the altar,
to the sufferings and death of the Redeemer in all its touching
and thrilling reality. At the altar a mystery is enacted; Christ
suffers and dies; the priest represents Him, and every act typifies
Christ’s Passion; just as He expired on the cross in actual fact,
so, mystically, He dies upon the altar.”[383] Though some writers of
the period dwell perhaps a little too much on the allegorical sense
then so popular in explaining the various acts of the Mass, yet, in
their conviction that its character was sacrificial and that it truly
re-enacted the death of Christ, they were in perfect agreement with
the past. In the explanations of the Mass everyone was reminded of his
union with Christ; and our Lord’s sufferings “were brought before the
mind of both priest and people”; by this means the “outward ceremonial
of the Mass was made a fruitful source of inward edification.” “The
abundant mediæval literature on the Mass is a proof both of the needs
of the clergy, and of the care displayed by the learned and those in
authority, to instruct them. In this matter the 15th century excels
the earlier Middle Ages.”[384] The very abuses and the formalism which
Franz finds witnessed to in certain mediæval sermons on the Mass,
chiefly in the matter of undue stress laid on the “fruits of the
Mass,” reveal merely an over-estimation on the part of the individual
of his union with Christ, or a too great assurance of obtaining help
in bodily and spiritual necessities; of want of fervour or of hope
there is not the least trace.
It is well worthy of note that Luther, if we may believe what he said
in a sermon in 1532, even in his monastic days, did not prize or love
the close bond of union established with Christ by the daily sacrifice
of the Mass: “Ah, bah, Masses! Let what cannot stand fast fall. You
never cared about saying Mass formerly; of that I am sure. I know it
from my own case; for I too was a holy monk, and blasphemed my dear
Lord miserably for the space of quite fifteen years with my saying of
Masses, though I never liked doing so, in spite of being so holy and
devout.”[385]
In spite of this Luther succeeded in bequeathing to posterity the
opinion that it was he who delivered people from that “alienation from
God” imposed on the world in the Middle Ages; “who broke down the
prohibition of the mediæval Church against anyone concerning himself on
his own account with matters of religion”; and who gave back “personal
religion” to the Christian.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account