As he frequently declared, the utmost freedom was to prevail in
matters of ritual in order to avoid a relapse into the Popish practice
of man-made ordinances. Even the adoption of the “Deudsche Messe,
etc.,” was to be left to the decision of the congregations and the
pastors.[518] If they knew of anything better to set up in its place,
this was not to be excluded; yet in every parish-congregation there
must at least be uniformity. The chief thing is charity, edification
and regard for the weak. Above all, the “Word must have free course and
not be allowed to degenerate into singing and shouting, as was formerly
the case.”[519]
Of the whole of the Wittenberg liturgical service, he says in his
“Deudsche Messe”—to the surprise of his readers who expected to find
in it a work for the believers—that it did not concern true believers
at all: “In short we do not set up such a service for those who are
already Christians.”[520] He is thinking, of course, of the earnest,
convinced Christians whom, as stated above (p. 133 f.), he had long
planned to assemble in special congregations. They alone in his eyes
constituted the true Church, however imperfect and sinful they might
be, provided they displayed faith and good-will.
“They” (the true believers), he here says of his regulations, “need
none of these things, for which indeed we do not live, but rather
they for the sake of us who are not yet Christians, in order that
we may become Christian; true believers have their service in the
spirit.”[521] In the case of the particular assemblies he had in
mind for the latter, they would have to “enter their names and meet
in some house or other for prayer, reading, baptism, receiving of
the Sacrament and other Christian works.” “Here there would be no
need of loud or fine singing. They could descant a while on baptism
and the Sacrament, and direct everything towards the Word and prayer
and charity. All they would need would be a good, short catechism
on faith, the Ten Commandments and the Our Father.” Amongst them
ecclesiastical discipline and particularly excommunication would be
introduced; such assemblies would also be well suited for “common
almsgiving,” all the members helping in replenishing the poor-box.[522]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account