Holy men, of real zeal, had always been able to discern the good side
by side with the bad. But the youthful Luther sees on every side, and
everywhere nothing but false teaching (“_scatet totus orbis_,” etc.),
nay, a very “deluge of filthy doctrines.”[716] To be made a bishop is
to him tantamount to branding oneself a “Sodomite”; so full of vice
is the episcopate that those wearers of the mitre were the best who
had no sin on their conscience beyond avarice.[717] As for the men of
learning, they rank far below Tauler, and, thanks to their narrowness,
had made the age “one of iron, nay, of clay.”[718] When setting faith
and grace against the alleged heathenism of the scholars he goes
so far as to say, that his man is he “who outside of grace knows
nothing.”[719] As early as 1515 he thinks himself qualified to attack
the authorities and the highest circles because “his teaching-office
lent him apostolic power to say and to reveal what was being done
amiss.”[720]
Why, we may, however, ask, did not the reformer of the Church begin
with himself, seeing that, in the lectures on the Psalms just
mentioned, he already laments the coldness of his own religious
life?[721] Even then he felt temptations pressing upon him; already
in consequence of his manifold and distracting labours he had lapsed
into a state in which prayer became distasteful to him, and of which
he writes to an intimate friend in 1523: “In body I am fairly well
but I am so much taken up with outward business that the spirit is
almost extinguished and rarely takes thought for itself.”[722] These
words and other earlier admissions (above, vol. i., p. 275 ff.) throw
a strange light on the legend according to which he had wrestled in
prayer by day and by night.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account