Now, although Luther uses powerful words to describe the dignity of the
different worldly callings, on the other hand, he tends at times to
depreciate whole classes, this being especially the case when he allows
his disappointment to get the better of him. Nor is the contempt openly
expressed here counterbalanced by any sufficient recognition of the
good, such as might have mollified his hearers and made them forget the
ungracious abuse he thundered from his pulpit.
He speaks bitterly of the common people, the proletariate of to-day,
to which, according to him, belonged all the lower classes in the
towns. Although himself of low extraction he displays very little
sympathy for the people. “We must not pipe too much to the mob, for
they are fond of raging.… They have no idea of self-restraint or how
to exercise it, and each one’s skin conceals five tyrants.”[198] “A
donkey must taste the stick and the mob must be ruled by force; of
this God was well aware, hence in the hands of the authorities He
placed, not a fox’s brush, but a sword.”[199]
He only too frequently accuses the artisan and merchant class, as
a whole, of cheating, avarice and laziness. At Wittenberg they
may possibly have been exceptionally bad, yet he does not speak
sufficiently of their less blameworthy side.
For the soldiers, it is true, he has friendly words of appreciation of
their calling; it was for them that he wrote in 1526 a special work,
where he replied in the affirmative to the question contained in the
title: “Can even men-at-arms be in a state of grace?” Yet even here he
does not shrink from bringing forward charges against their calling:
“A great part of the men-at-arms are the devil’s own and some of them
are actually crammed with devils.… They imagine themselves fire-eaters
because they swear shamefully, perpetrate atrocities, and curse and
defy the God of Heaven.”[200]
Of the nobles he says in 1523, wishing to promote more frequent
marriages between them and those of lower birth:[201] “Must all
princes and nobles who are born princes and nobles remain for ever
such? What harm is there if a prince takes a burgher’s daughter to
wife and contents himself with a burgher’s modest dowry? Or, why
should not a noble maid give her hand to a burgher? In the long run it
will not do for the nobles always to intermarry with nobles. Although
we are not all equal in the sight of the world yet before God we all
are equal, all of us children of Adam, creatures of God, and one man
as good as another.” These words certainly do not express any lively
conviction of the importance of the existing distinctions of rank for
society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account