Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United StatesCutler, James Elbert
Philosophy
Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United States
Cutler, James Elbert
Lynching -- United States
LYNCH-LAW
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE HISTORY OF LYNCHING IN THE UNITED STATES
BY
JAMES ELBERT CUTLER, PH.D.
_Instructor in Economics in Wellesley College; sometime Henry C.
Robinson Fellow and Instructor in Political Economy in Yale University_
❦
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.
91 AND 93 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK
LONDON AND BOMBAY
1905
Copyright, 1905
By LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.
_All rights reserved_
_The Plimpton Press Norwood Mass._
FOREWORD
Few people are able to read about lynch-executions, with atrocious forms
of torture and cruel death, such as have occurred from time to time
within ten years in this country, without a feeling of national shame.
It is necessary that facts should be known and that public opinion
should be corrected as to the ethics of that mode of dealing with crime.
Lynch-law is a very different thing where laws and civil institutions
are in full force and activity from what it is where they are wanting.
It is not admissible that a self-governing democracy should plead the
remissness of its own selected agents as an excuse for mob-violence. It
is a disgrace to our civilization that men can be put to death by
painful methods, which our laws have discarded as never suitable, and
without the proofs of guilt which our laws call for in any case
whatsoever. It would be a disgrace to us if amongst us men should burn a
rattlesnake or a mad dog. The badness of the victim is not an element in
the case at all. Torture and burning are forbidden, not because the
victim is not bad enough, but because we are too good. It is on account
of what we owe to ourselves that these methods are shameful to us, if we
descend to them. It is evident, however, that public opinion is not
educated up to this level. The reader of the present book will learn
very interesting facts about the causes alleged for lynching, and about
the public view of that crime. Many current errors will be corrected,
and many notions which are irrelevant, although they are popularly
believed to be germane and important, will be set aside.
W. G. SUMNER.
NEW HAVEN, CONN., February, 1905.
PREFACE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account