Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United StatesCutler, James Elbert
Philosophy
Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United States
Cutler, James Elbert
Lynching -- United States
In the year 1765 and for several succeeding years the “Sons of
Liberty” were particularly active in stirring up resistance to the
acts of the British government, which were considered oppressive. The
“Sons of Liberty,” elsewhere as well as in Boston, seem to have been
regularly organized and to have held secret meetings at which
resolutions were adopted and definite plans of action were determined
upon for either driving away or punishing certain “Stamp Masters,”
“infamous importers,” and “informers.” Warning notices were frequently
posted and published, signed by “P. P., Clerk,” “M. Y., Secretary,”
&c. Hanging and burning in effigy, flagellation, tarring and
feathering, and ducking, were the punitive measures generally
threatened and not infrequently carried into effect.—These statements
are based on a collection of notes on “Sons of Liberty” which were
loaned to the writer by Mr. Albert Matthews.
Footnote 92:
For an exposition of the condition of society, its state of
dissolution and lack of organization, during the Revolutionary period
and subsequent to that period, see W. G. Sumner: “Alexander Hamilton”
(1890). On page 13 this statement is made: “The Union was from the
start at war with the turbulent, anarchistic elements which the
Revolution had set loose.”
Footnote 93:
A correspondent of the _New England Gazette_ in 1776 asked “whether it
would be featherable for a man to be detected with one of them
(pardons from the king) in his pocket.”—Frank Moore: “Diary of the
Revolution (1875), p. 226. Paul Leicester Ford, when writing his
historical novel “Janice Meredith,” treated tarring and feathering as
an ordinary incident of Revolutionary times. See Chapters XVII,
XXXVIII.
Footnote 94:
John Drayton: “Memoirs of the American Revolution” (1821), I, 273.
Frank Moore: “Diary of the Revolution” (1875), p. 44. Joseph Johnson:
“Traditions and Reminiscences” (1851), p. 70. Edward McCrady: “South
Carolina in the Revolution 1775–1780” (1901), p. 24. The date on which
the tarring and feathering of Thomas Ditson of the town of Billerica
took place was March 9, not March 8, as given by the above writers.
For an explanation of the discrepancy in the date and for a
description of the occurrence, see _Boston Gazette_, March 13, 1775
(No. 1039, p. 3); March 20, 1775 (No. 1040, p. 3).
Footnote 95:
Joseph Johnson: “Traditions and Reminiscences” (1851), p. 71. “The
punishment of banishment, preceded by the more dreadful operation of
tarring and feathering,” was put in execution by a “judicial
Association” in the early days of a settlement on the Bay of Islands,
New Zealand. See R. G. Jameson: “New Zealand, South Australia, and New
South Wales” (London, 1842), pp. 190–191.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive