Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future woman — John Shaqi
Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future womanLudovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Philosophy
Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future woman
Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Women; Women -- Social and moral questions
(=a=) _The absurd superstition that our heads are getting larger and
that the pelves of women are getting smaller._ Doctors are persuaded
that the difficulty of modern childbirth must be due to “Progress.” And,
since “Progress” is erroneously connected in their own and most people’s
minds with the belief that men are growing more intelligent (which quite
obviously they are not), the facile conclusion is reached that, as our
brains must be growing larger, our heads must follow suit. It is hardly
necessary to say that this is sheer nonsense, and no more than an
indolent excuse for the Conservative stagnation of the medical
brotherhood. The heads of modern people are certainly not larger than
the heads of their ancestors ten thousand years ago (_vide_ Keith’s
_Antiquity of_ _Man_); and as to the shrinking of women’s hips, this
also is an invention. It is certainly found, but only where the pelvis
is rachitic, or where undue strains on the thighs in early childhood (in
violent games, etc.) have led to a premature stiffening of the fleshy,
and a premature ossification of the bony, parts. At all events, it is
much less common than is usually supposed; and, in any case, it is very
seldom that there is any disproportion between the sizes of the foetus
and the pelvis. See, however, how convenient the explanation
is—Increasing brains, larger heads, and shrinking pelves!—The doctors,
shrugging their shoulders before this apparently vicious circle, can
quietly resign themselves, _à la_ Walrus and Carpenter, to a permanent
engagement as artificial functionaries to supersede a perfectly natural
human function; and, what is more, they need feel no dread about growing
thinner or poorer themselves as time goes on, nor trouble to discover
how normal functioning can be recovered.
(=b=) _The still more absurd superstition that a baby should be 8 or 9
lbs at birth._ This is universal in England, and whether it is the daily
newspapers over the birth of a prince, or a poor woman’s neighbours over
the birth of a new pauper, everybody is jubilant if an 8-lb baby is
born. It may have required a team from Harley Street to deliver it, and
it may, and usually does, lose weight after birth; but all this does not
matter: nobody cares, nobody troubles to think, provided that it has
registered the full 8 lbs in the first hour of its existence.
Unfortunate women, permanently injured by instruments, smile
triumphantly over the thought that they have had a baby-boy weighing 9
lbs. But what can we expect when their doctors encourage them in these
lunatic transports?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account