Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future woman — John Shaqi
Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future womanLudovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Philosophy
Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future woman
Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Women; Women -- Social and moral questions
For a long time it has seemed to him suspicious that Nature, who is so
uniform in her methods and who with such unfailing consistency has made
all vital functions pleasant, should have made this one conspicuous
exception, particularly in regard to a function linked to the most vital
moment in our lives. Being unsatisfied with the verdict of science on
the subject, therefore, he made inquiries on his own account, and was
not at all surprised to find, not only that a number of existing races
still enjoy infinitely greater ease in parturition than most European
women, but also that, as he expected, there are still to be found among
mankind faint vestiges of that ecstasy which he believes must once have
attended the function in normal circumstances. Even the dreams of some
European women lead the inquirer to suspect the existence of this
ecstasy not so very far back along the racial line. When, however, the
present writer expressed this view in a recent work dealing with the
subject,[8] he provoked the most violent indignation, particularly among
women themselves.
Footnote 8:
See _Woman: A Vindication_ (Constable and Co.: 1923).
After having made a number of observations and experiments on the higher
animals, he discovered not only that parturition is in fact ecstatic
among these animals when in their natural condition, but also that their
ecstasy can quickly be altered to anguish by only the smallest
divergence from the normal in their food during gestation.
Observing animals in a state of nature, moreover, he arrived at this
interesting conclusion, _that their young_, even when the mothers are in
splendid fettle, _are only skin and bone at birth_, that their birth is
an ecstatic function to the mother only when they are in this state, and
that young born in this way not only never lose weight, but grow as
plump and vigorous as could be wished in the first twenty-four hours.
If, however, the gestating mother’s food be so modified _as to make it
unlike the natural food of the species_—for instance, if large
quantities of potatoes, bread, cabbage, and rice-pudding be given to a
female cat, with rations of cooked instead of raw meat—the birth of the
kittens, which are grossly fat, is immensely difficult, and some of them
may be still-born or appear only after long delay in mutilated
fragments.
The present writer has confirmed these facts repeatedly, and they led
him to ask this question: _whether civilized women, even in antiquity,
have not habitually taken the wrong food during gestation, with the
result that their babies have been too fat or too hard in the bone at
birth_?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account