Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future womanLudovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Philosophy
Lysistrata : $b or, Woman's future and future woman
Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Women; Women -- Social and moral questions
Place a human baby at the dug of a cow, a goat, or an ass, as you
sometimes see them placed in semi-civilized countries, and what is it
that you immediately feel? The sight is an offence to the eyes, a
humiliation of our racial pride.—Why?
Instinctively we feel and intellectually we know that Nature makes the
wisest provision for her needs. When, therefore, we see one of our
babies at the dugs of a goat, our sense of fitness is shocked: even our
practical utilitarian prejudices receive a blow. We know instantly that
the baby cannot have been meant to take that milk, because it is a
nobler creature than the goat and its body has tasks and feats to
perform with its food which the kid has not. Above all, it has that huge
brain to develop, which the kid has not. Can it be possible that Nature
could have overlooked that? The human brain is not only larger at birth
than that of any other animal, but its rate of growth is also greater.
Is it conceivable that Nature could have made no special provision for
that?
Hence our sense of degradation and revolt—feelings which somehow are not
provoked when the milk reaches us in a bright glass-bottle, or in a nice
clean tin covered with printed matter—because all the degrading side of
it is then hidden from our view.
The strange part of it, however, is that this sense of degradation and
revolt is based upon fact; for not only on _a priori_ grounds may we
deny that goat’s milk or any other substitute can adequately replace
breast-feeding, but we may also deny it from positive knowledge.
Years ago Dr Biedert showed that the most important differences between
human and cow’s milk were qualitative rather than quantitative. A little
later Dr G. von Bunge confirmed this view; and Dr Halliburton, the great
physiologist, has recently repeated and emphasized it. It is impossible
to enter here into the qualitative differences to which these
authorities refer: suffice it to say that the gravity of the whole
question from our standpoint lies not merely in the greater
digestibility of human milk, but in the conspicuous difference between
human milk and all other substitutes as a brain-developing food. Dr von
Bunge, who calls attention to this point, claims not only that human
milk is more complex than its substitutes, but that in it we find
lecithin bodies in peculiar proportions, which serve for the
construction of the inordinately large human brain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account