Machine-Gun TacticsApplin, R. V. K. (Reginald Vincent Kempenfeldt)
History
Machine-Gun Tactics
Applin, R. V. K. (Reginald Vincent Kempenfeldt)
Machine guns
60 to 90 seconds is sufficient time to obtain the desired effect,
and before the enemy’s artillery can get the range a second signal
from the commander sends the guns out of action again as rapidly
as they appeared. This is one of the most successful methods of
employing machine guns: there is no risk of being seen before the
target appears, there is no “giving away the position” by careless
scouts, and there is no chance that a powerful pair of glasses will
discover the guns in position before they open fire and turn the
tables by surprising them instead. On the other hand, it requires
very highly trained detachments and a vast amount of peace practice
to ensure its success in war.
Alternative positions are always necessary when the deliberate
method is used, and must be carefully practised in peace--the
principal points to be observed being: (1) That the second
position is suitable for bringing effective fire to bear on the
enemy, and (2) that the gun is able to gain the position without
exposure.
Scouts so often forget that they can work with ease where it is
impossible to carry a gun; and unless the above conditions are
fulfilled, the alternative position will be useless.
The place for dismounting the guns must always be as close to the
fire position as possible without exposing the teams to fire or
view; the reserve ammunition must be brought up to this spot, and
precautions must be taken to prevent the teams being surprised
from the flanks or rear if exposed. Machine guns should never be
advanced for a short distance. If it is desired to obtain a closer
range, nothing is gained by moving two or three hundred yards,
while the guns are exposed to considerable risk. The guns are just
as effective at 1,000 yards as at 800, and when a closer range is
necessary they must await the opportunity for moving up to close
range, _i.e._, 300 or 400 yards, where their fire may be decisive.
COVER
Cover may be of two kinds:
(1) _Cover from fire._
(2) _Cover from view._
Cover from fire must be proof against the projectiles likely to be
used against it--that is, against rifle fire and shrapnel. “Cover
from fire” should also be “cover from view” if possible; it must
be inconspicuous, and should be of the same colour and material as
the background and locality. It must be as low as is compatible
with command, and must never be on the skyline. The following
points in the order given constitute good “cover from fire”:
(1) Bullet proof.
(2) Good field of fire.
(3) Invisibility.
(4) Protection from enfilade fire.
(5) Good line of retreat (under cover).
“Cover from view” is often not cover from fire, and must be used
with great caution; it is the principal means by which guns are
brought up to the fire position without the enemy’s knowledge,
thus effecting a surprise. Cover may be either (1) natural, (2)
artificial, (3) a combination of both.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account