Madame Roland: A Biographical StudyTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
Madame Roland: A Biographical Study
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Roland, Madame, 1754-1793
It was soon evident that the new cause would not be supported.
Nevertheless, the new word was launched. The effect of the injudicious,
impractical action of Paine, Brissot, and their friends, Robespierre
described a few months later when he had broken with the Brissotins.
“The mere word _Republic_ caused division among the patriots, and gave
the enemies of liberty the evidence they sought to prove that there
existed in France a party which conspired against the monarchy and the
constitution; they hastened to impute to this motive the firmness with
which we defended in the Constituent Assembly the rights of national
sovereignty against the monster of inviolability. It is by this word
that they drove away the majority of the Constituent Assembly; it is
this word which was the signal for that massacre of peaceable citizens
whose whole crime was exercising legally the right of petition,
consecrated by the constitutional laws. At this word the true friends of
liberty were travestied as factious by perverse or ignorant citizens;
and the Revolution put back perhaps a half a century. It was in those
critical times that Brissot came to the society of the Friends of the
Constitution, where he had almost never appeared, to propose changes in
the form of government, when the simplest rules of prudence would have
forbidden us to present the idea to the Constituent Assembly.”
As soon as the Rolands and their friends saw that the demand for the
Republic was not welcomed by the people, they turned their efforts
towards securing a trial for Louis XVI.
It seemed to be the only thing for which they were strong enough. To do
this they were willing to unite with even demagogues, agitators, and
with the worst elements of the people. They had only their voice and
their pen, explains Madame Roland; if a popular movement came to their
aid they welcomed it with pleasure without looking after, or disturbing
themselves about, its origin. Beside they could not believe that a party
made up of the idle and the violent, and led by demagogues, could be
formidable. It was a force to be used when needed, and crushed when the
result desired had been obtained. Even when the union of the Brissotins
with the populace had produced so serious a riot as that of July 17, the
“Massacre of the Champ-de-Mars,” as the radicals called it, Madame
Roland did not change her views. She refused to see that the disorder
was provoked in any degree by the people, and attributed the fault
entirely to the Assembly and Lafayette.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account