Madame Roland: A Biographical StudyTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
Madame Roland: A Biographical Study
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Roland, Madame, 1754-1793
In her judgment the supporters of the monarchy were “traitors,” the
constitutionalists a “cabale.” This suspicion had become a disease.
While she doubted the sincerity, the patriotism, the unselfishness of
all parties but her own, she had profound confidence in herself. She saw
no rôle in the world she says in her Memoirs, which suited her exactly
except that of Providence. She had penetration, and flattered herself
that she knew a “false eye” at first glance. She and Roland were “strong
in reason and in character,” but she was convinced that she was better
than he. “I have as much firmness and more flexibility. My energy has
more agreeable forms, but it is founded on the same principles. I shock
less and I penetrate deeper.” As for the majority of the human race, it
was a “poor” affair.
She not only suspected the old régime, and believed herself superior to
it; she cherished a personal grievance against it. It had refused her
solicitations although they were just. She did not forgive the
humiliation. She was near enough to the Court now to feel her dependence
upon it. Years before she had written to Sophie: “I love my prince
because I feel my dependence but little; if I were too near him, I
should hate his grandeur.” She is “too near” now, and her prophecy is
realized. She “hates his grandeur.” It is a species of that resentful
jealousy which distorts certain really superior natures when they find
themselves in the presence of material splendor or of persons of lofty
rank.
When the Rolands went up to Paris in December, 1791, they found there a
number of important persons who felt as they did, members of the
Legislative Assembly, which had assembled on October 1st. They found,
too, that they were already allied with their friends Brissot,
Robespierre, and Pétion, all three of whom held prominent public
positions, Brissot being a deputy to the Assembly from Paris, and at the
head of the diplomatic committee; Robespierre, criminal accuser; Pétion,
mayor.
This party of new deputies whom they found so congenial were known as
the Gironde from the department whence most of them had come. They were
all young and all endowed with great talent. They had been brought up on
Plutarch and Rousseau, and their heads were filled with noble doctrines
and drafts of perfect constitutions. When they talked, it was in classic
phrases. Their arguments were based on what happened in Greece and Rome.
Their illustrations were drawn from ancient heroes. There could be no
doubt of the sincerity of their patriotism, of the nobility of their
aspirations, of the purity of their lives, of their anxiety to die, if
need be, for France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account