Magic Shadows: The Story of the Origin of Motion PicturesQuigley, Martin
History
Magic Shadows: The Story of the Origin of Motion Pictures
Quigley, Martin
Lantern projection; Motion pictures -- History
Kircher also described how images of objects could be projected by
means of the light of a candle. Through this system various images
were exhibited in a darkened chamber. But Kircher evidently was not
satisfied with this method, for no illustration of it appeared in
the first edition of his book. The reason is obvious. A candle could
provide only enough illumination for the faintest shadows. Kircher
wrote that those objects which need only a fraction of the sun’s light
can be shown by a candle in a small room. Two methods for this were
indicated: (1) with a concave mirror reflecting the images and (2)
projecting the image through a lens. It was noted that the better
single method was through the lens. A combination of the two provided
the most light. Kircher remarked that he had read in a history of the
Arabs that a certain king of Bagdad used a mirror to work wonders in
order to deceive the people. He also pointed out that some men had
used mirrors to project into dark places what the ignorant thought were
devils.
The chief problem in Kircher’s day and for centuries afterwards was
to provide sufficient light. The final solution did not come until
electric light was introduced. Probably Kircher’s most efficient
projection was one in which the sun was used as the source of light.
Even in the early part of the 20th century arrangements were used
which hooked up the sun with the magic lantern because it was thought
that the results were even better and cheaper than those obtained with
electric light.
Kircher’s sun magic projector used a real optical system which is
fundamental even to this day. There was first the source of light, then
a reflector and the object, and the projected image. The effects, of
course, would be most startling in a darkened room. Kircher also showed
how shadows of any type of figure could be thrown onto a wall or screen
through the same method.
In those days when there was much secret correspondence and keen
interest in various forms of cipher, many of Kircher’s readers were
glad to note how the magic lantern could be used for such a purpose. At
that time people would not, it was believed, detect that the letters in
such a system were simply backwards and upside down. The message could
be read easily by projecting images of the letters. The same result
could be had by turning the paper upside down and holding it before a
mirror.
After listing these many diverse uses of the magic lantern system
Kircher thought it well to conclude his book lest he be charged with
“meandering” endlessly on a subject which some would consider trivial.
Kircher said, “We leave all these to the talented reader for further
refinement. A word to the wise is sufficient. Innumerable things could
be said concerning the application of this device but we leave to
others new material of invention and lest this work grow too long we
cut off the thread of discussion about these devices.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account