Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
On the whole, the miseries of the long centuries of Anglo-Saxon rule
were mainly the outcome of the Crown’s weakness; while, at the Norman
Conquest, England escaped from the mild sceptre of inefficiency, only to
fall under the cruel sceptre of selfish strength. Yet the able kings of
the new dynasty, powerful as they were, had to struggle in order to
maintain their supremacy; for, although the conquered English races were
incapable of concerted resistance against their Norman masters, the
unruly alien barons fought vigorously to shake off the royal control.
During a century of Norman rule, constant warfare was waged between two
great principles—the monarchic standing on the whole for order, seeking
to crush anarchy, and the oligarchic or baronial, standing on the whole
for liberty, protesting against the tyranny of autocratic power.
Sometimes one of these was in the ascendant; sometimes the other. The
history of medieval England is the swing of the pendulum between these
two extremes.
The main plot, then, of early English history, centres round the attempt
to found a strong monarchy, and yet to set limits to its strength. With
this main plot subordinate plots are interwoven. Chief among these must
be reckoned the necessity of defining the relations of the central to
the local government, and the need of an acknowledged frontier between
the domains of Church and State. On the other hand, all that interesting
group of problems connected with the _ideal form_ of government, much
discussed in the days of Aristotle as in our own, is notably absent,
never having been forced by the logic of events upon the mind of
medieval Europe. Monarchy was apparently assumed as the only possible
scheme of government; while the relative merits of aristocracy and
democracy, or of the much-vaunted constitution known as “mixed,” were
not canvassed, since these forms of constitution were not within the
sphere of practical politics.
The student of history will do well to concentrate his attention at
first on the main problem, while viewing the subsidiary ones in their
relations to the central current.
I. William I. to Henry II.—Main Problem: the Monarchy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account