Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
Henry I. (1100-35) took up, with far-seeing statesman’s eye and much
vigour, the work of consolidation. His policy shows an advance upon that
of his father. William had contented himself with controlling and
curbing the main vices of feudalism, while he played off against it the
English native institutions. Henry went further, and introduced within
the _Curia Regis_ itself a new class of men representing a new principle
of government. The great offices of state, previously held by men of
baronial rank, were now filled with creatures of Henry’s own, men of
humble birth, whose merit had raised them to his favour, and whose only
title to power lay in his goodwill. The employment of this strictly
professional class of administrators was one of the chief contributions
made by Henry to the growth of the constitution. His other great
achievement was the organization of the Exchequer, primarily as a source
of royal revenue, but soon found useful as a means of making his will
felt in every corner of England. For this great work he was fortunate to
secure in Roger, Bishop of Salisbury, the help of a man who combined
genius with painstaking ability. At the Exchequer, as organized by the
King and his minister, the sheriff of each county twice a year, at
Easter and at Michaelmas, rendered account of every payment that had
passed through his hands. His balance was adjusted before all the great
officers of the King’s household, who subjected his accounts to close
scrutiny and criticism. Official records were drawn up, one of which—the
famous Pipe Roll of 1130,—is extant at the present day. As the sums
received by the sheriff affected every class of society in town and
country, these half-yearly audits enabled the King’s advisers to
scrutinize the lives and conduct of every one of importance in the land.
These half-yearly investigations were rendered more effective by the
existence at the Exchequer of a great record of every landed estate in
England. With this the sheriffs’ returns could be checked and compared.
Henry’s Exchequer thus found one of its most powerful weapons in the
great Domesday Survey, the most enduring proof of the statesmanship of
the Conqueror, by whose orders and under whose direction it had been
compiled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account