Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
(1) _The British Museum Magna Carta, number one_—formally cited as
“Cotton, Charters XIII. 31A.” The recent history of this document is
well known. It was found among the archives of Dover Castle in the
seventeenth century; and not improbably it may have lain there for
centuries before, possibly from a date not much later than that of its
original execution; for the castle of Dover, like the Tower of London,
was a natural place for the preservation of documents of national value.
There it was discovered by Sir Edward Dering while warden of the castle,
and by him it was presented to Sir Robert Cotton, accompanied by a
letter dated 10th May, 1630.[285] It still forms an item in the
collection preserved in the British Museum, which bears the name of the
famous antiquary.
-----
Footnote 285:
This letter is also preserved in the British Museum, and cited as
“Cotton, Julius, C. III. Fol. 191.”
-----
In the great fire of 23rd October, 1731, which attacked the Cottonian
Library, this valuable Charter was seriously damaged and rendered in
parts illegible, while the yellow wax of the seal was partially melted.
It is possible that this accident has added somewhat to the prestige of
this particular copy of Magna Carta, which, like the three others still
extant, is written continuously, though with many contractions, in a
neat, running, Norman hand. A special characteristic of this version is
that some omissions seem to have been made in the body of the deed and
to have been supplied at the foot of the parchment. These are five in
number.[286] It is possible to regard them as corrections of clerical
omissions due to carelessness or hurry in engrossing the deed; but the
fact that one of the additions is distinctly in the King’s favour raises
a strong presumption that they embodied additions made as afterthoughts
to what had been originally dictated to the engrossing clerk, and that
they were inserted at the King’s suggestion before he would adhibit the
great seal.
-----
Footnote 286:
These are carefully noted among the variations described by the
editors of the Charters of Liberties forming Part I. of the first
volume of the _Statutes of the Realm_. These addenda are (1) at the
end of c. 48, “_per eosdem, ita quod nos hoc sciamus prius, vel
justiciarius noster, si in Anglia non fuerimus_,” providing that the
King should receive intimation of all forest practices branded as
“evil” before they are abrogated; (2) two small additions, near the
beginning of c. 53, (a), “_et eodem modo de justicia exhibenda_,” and
(b) “_vel remansuris forestis_”; (3) in c. 56, these four words, “_in
Anglia vel in Wallia_”; and (4) in c. 61 the words “_in perpetuum_”
after “_gaudere_.” In the 2nd British Museum MS. three of these
addenda appear at the foot, viz. (1), (2_a_) and (2_b_); but the words
of (3) and (4) are incorporated in the body of that MS.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account