Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
I. _The King’s Title._ Some points of interest are suggested by the form
of the royal style adopted by John, which is connected by an unbroken
thread of development with that of William I. on the one hand, and of
His Majesty, Edward VII., on the other. John’s assumption of the royal
plural “_Sciatis Nos_” reads, in the light of subsequent history, as a
tribute to his arrogance rather than to his greatness, when compared
with the humbler first person singular consistently used by his more
distinguished father. In this particular, however, Richard, not John,
had been the innovator on the usage of Henry II.[325] For a further
alteration in the royal style John was alone responsible. To the titles
borne by his father and brother, John invariably added that of “lord of
Ireland,” a reminiscence of his youth. When the wide territories of
Henry II., had been distributed among his elder sons, the young John
(hence known as “John Lackland”) was left without a heritage, until his
father bestowed on him the island of Ireland, recently appropriated; and
this brought with it the right to style himself “_dominus Hibernie_.”
This title of his younger days was not unnaturally retained by him after
he had outlived all his brothers and inherited their wide lands and
honours.
-----
Footnote 325:
Coke (_Second Institute_, pp. 1-2) is here in error; he makes John the
innovator.
-----
John began his reign in 1199 as ruler over the undivided possessions of
the House of Anjou at their widest stretch, extending without a break,
other than the waters of the Channel, from the Cheviots to the Pyrenees.
These lands were held by John, as by his father, under a variety of
titles and conditions. Anjou, the original home and fief of the
hot-blooded Plantagenet race, still carried with it only the modest rank
of count. In addition to this paternal title, Henry II. had, at an early
age, become duke of Normandy in his mother’s right, and thereafter duke
of Aquitaine by marriage with Eleanor, its heiress. These three great
fiefs were held by Henry and his sons under the king of France as their
lord paramount. Long before 1215, John’s bad fortune or incompetence had
lost to him these wide continental dominions except the most distant of
them all, his mother’s dowry of Aquitaine. His ancestral domains of
Anjou and Normandy had been irretrievably lost, but he still retained
their empty titles; and in this his son Henry III. followed him,
grasping the shadow long after the substance had fled. Entries relating
to Gascony frequently appear on the Rolls of Parliament of Edward I.;
and the kings of England were styled dukes of Aquitaine, dukes of
Guienne, or dukes of Gascony (the three descriptions being used
indifferently) until Edward III. merged all these titles in a wider one,
when he claimed the throne of France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account