Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
England alone, of John’s possessions, real and nominal, was held by the
higher style of “_Rex_,” implying strictly sovereign rule, independent
of any overlord, and retained by John in 1215 in spite of his recent
acceptance of Innocent III. as feudal overlord. Of Ireland, John was
still content to describe himself, as formerly, “lord,” not king. The
exact meaning of the word “_Dominus_” in medieval charters, particularly
in those of Stephen, has been made the subject of much learned
controversy; which has not yet resulted in a consensus of opinion as to
the technical meaning, if any, borne by the word.[326] “_Dominus_,”
indeed, seems to have been loosely used wherever something of substance
or of ceremonial was lacking from the full sovereignty implied in the
more specific name of king. In this connection much stress was laid on
the solemn sacrament of coronation, implying among other things formal
consecration by the church.[327]
Footnote 326:
Various theories will be found in Round’s _Geoffrey de Mandeville_,
70; Dr. Rüssler’s _Matilde_, 291–4; and Ramsay’s _Foundations of
England_, II. 403.
Footnote 327:
Cf. _supra_, p. 119.
-----
John’s connection with England, then, is expressed in two simple words,
“_Rex Anglie_,” no explanation being vouchsafed of how he had acquired
this title. Such vindication, indeed, was not called for, as this was no
coronation charter, John having already reigned for fifteen years
without any serious rival—the claims of Arthur, the son of his elder
brother Geoffrey, never having been taken seriously in England.[328] The
simple words, “_Dei gratia rex Anglie_,” may be contrasted with the
detailed titles set out in the coronation charters of Henry I. and
Stephen respectively. Henry I. in 1100 had emphasized his relationship
to preceding kings, describing himself as “_Filius Willelmi regis post
obitum fratris sui Willelmi, Dei gracia rex Anglorum_”;[329] while
Stephen in April, 1136, in his second and more deliberate charter, used
an entirely different formula, “_Dei gracia assensu cleri et populi in
regem Anglie electus, et a Willelmo Cantuarensi archiepiscopo et sancte
Romane ecclesie legato consecratus, et ab Innocentio sancte Romane sedis
pontifice postmodum confirmatus_,”[330] the laboured nature of which
betrays the consciousness of weakness.
-----
Footnote 328:
Geoffrey’s daughter Eleanor was in 1215, a prisoner in Corfe Castle.
See _infra_, c. 59.
Footnote 329:
See Appendix.
Footnote 330:
See Appendix.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account