Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
These reforms, besides influencing the current of events in England in
numerous ways, both direct and indirect, all helped to strengthen the
throne of Henry and his sons. Another class of reforms contributed
greatly to the same result, namely, the reorganization of the army. This
was effected in various ways: partly by the revival and more strict
enforcement of the obligations connected with the old Anglo-Saxon fyrd
or militia, under the Assize of Arms in 1181, which compelled every
freeman to maintain at his own expense weapons and warlike equipment
suited to his station in life; partly by the ingenious method of
increasing the amount of feudal service due from Crown tenants, based
upon an investigation instituted by the Crown and upon the written
replies returned by the barons, known to historians as “the _Cartae_ of
1166”; and partly by the development (not, as is usually supposed, the
_invention_) of the principle of scutage, a means whereby unwilling
military service, limited as it was by annoying restrictions as to time
and place, might be exchanged at the option of the Crown for money, with
which a more flexible army of mercenaries might be hired.
By these expedients, along with many others, Henry raised the English
monarchy, always in the ascendant since the Conquest, to the very zenith
of its power, and left to his sons the entire machinery of government in
perfect working order, combining high administrative efficiency with
great strength. Full of bitter strifes and troubles as his reign of
thirty-five years had been, nothing had interfered with the vigour and
success of the policy whereby he tightened his hold on England. Neither
the long bitter struggle with Becket and the Church, ending as it did in
Henry’s personal humiliation, nor the unnatural warfare with his sons,
which involved the depths of personal suffering to the King and hastened
his death in 1189, was allowed to interfere with his projects of reform
in England.
The last twenty years of his life had been darkened for him, and proved
troubled and anarchic in the extreme to his continental dominions; but
in England profound peace reigned. The last serious revolt of the powers
of feudal anarchy had been suppressed in 1173 with characteristic
thoroughness and moderation. After that date, the English monarchy
retained its supremacy almost without an effort.
II. William I. to Henry II.—Problem of Local Government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account