Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction — John Shaqi
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
Henry II. before his death had fulfilled the task of restoring order, to
which destiny had called him. To effect this, he had brought to
perfection machinery of government of rare excellence, and equally well
adapted for purposes of taxation, of dispensing justice, and of general
administration. Great as was the power for good of this new instrument
in the hands of a wise and justice-loving king, it was equally powerful
for evil in the hands of an arrogant and unjust, or even of a careless
monarch. All the old enemies of the Crown had been crushed. Local
government, as now systematized, formed a source of strength, not of
weakness; while the Church, whose highest offices were now filled with
officials trained in Henry’s own Household and Exchequer (ecclesiastics
in name only, differing widely from saintly monks like Anselm), still
remained the fast friend of the Crown. The monarchy was strong enough to
defy any one section of the nation, and no inclination was yet apparent
among the estates of the realm to make common cause against the throne.
The very thoroughness with which the Crown had surmounted all its early
difficulties, induced in Henry’s successors, men born in the purple, an
exaggerated feeling of security, and a tendency to overreach themselves
by excessive arrogance. At the same time, the very abjectness of the
various factors of the nation, now prostrate beneath the heel of the
Crown, prepared them to sink their mutual suspicions and to form a tacit
alliance in order to join issue with their common oppressor. Powers used
moderately and on the whole for national ends by Henry, were abused for
purely selfish ends by his sons in succession. Richard’s heavy taxation
and contemptuous indifference to English interests gradually reconciled
men’s minds to thoughts of change, and prepared the basis of a combined
opposition to a power which threatened to grind all other powers to
powder.
In no direction were these abuses felt so severely as in taxation.
Financial machinery had been elaborated to perfection, and large
additional sums could be squeezed from every class in the nation by an
extra turn of the screw. Richard did not even require to incur the odium
of this, since the ministers, who were his instruments, shielded him
from the unpopularity of his measures, while he pursued his own good
pleasure abroad in war and tournament without even condescending to
visit the subjects he oppressed. Twice only, for a few months in each
case, did Richard visit England during a reign of ten years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account