Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
The death of Archbishop Hubert Walter in July, 1205, deprived King John
of the services of the most experienced statesman in England. It did
more, for it marked the termination of the long friendship between the
English Crown and the National Church. Its immediate effect was to
create a vacancy, the filling of which led to a bitter quarrel with
Rome.
John failed, as usual, to recognize the merits of abler men, and saw in
the death of his great Justiciar and Archbishop only the removal of an
unwelcome restraint, and the opening to the Crown of a desirable piece
of patronage. He prepared to strain to the utmost his rights in the
election of a successor to the See of Canterbury, in favour of one of
his own creatures, a certain John de Grey, already by royal influence
Bishop of Norwich. Unexpected opposition to his will was offered by the
canons of the Cathedral Church, who determined on a bold policy, namely,
to turn their nominal right of canonical election into a reality, and to
appoint their own nominee, without waiting either for the King’s
approval or the co-operation of the suffragan bishops of the Province,
who, during the last three vacancies, had put forth a claim to
participate in the election, and had invariably used their influence on
behalf of the King’s nominee. Reginald, the sub-prior, was secretly
elected by the monks, and hurried abroad to obtain confirmation at Rome
before the appointment was made public. Reginald’s vanity prevented his
keeping his pledge of secrecy, and a rumour reached the ear of John, who
brought pressure to bear on the monks, now frightened at their own
temerity, and secured de Grey’s appointment in a second election. The
Bishop of Norwich was actually enthroned at Canterbury, and invested by
the King with the temporalities of the See. All parties now sent
representatives to Rome. This somewhat petty squabble benefited none of
the original disputants; for the astute Innocent III. was quick to see
an opportunity for papal aggrandisement. Both elections were set aside
by decree of the Papal Curia, and the emissaries of the various parties
were coerced or persuaded to appoint there and then in the Pope’s
presence the Pope’s own nominee, a certain Cardinal, English-born, but
hitherto little known in England, Stephen Langton by name, destined to
play an important part in the future history of the land of his birth.
John refused to view this triumph of papal arrogance in the light of a
compromise—the view diplomatically suggested by Innocent. The King, with
the hot blood common to his race, and the bad judgment peculiar to
himself, rushed headlong into a quarrel with Rome which he was incapable
of carrying to a successful issue. The details of the struggle, the
interdicts and excommunications hurled by the Pope, and John’s measures
of retaliation against the unfortunate English clergy, need not be
discussed, since they do not directly affect the main plot which
culminated at Runnymede.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account