Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction — John Shaqi
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
Before his preparations were completed, an important assembly had met at
St. Albans (on 4th August) to make sworn inquest as to the extent of
damage done to churchmen during the years of John’s quarrel with Rome.
The meeting is notable, not merely because of the reason of its summons,
but also because of its composition. It is the earliest national council
in which the principle of representation received recognition (so far as
our records go).[12] Four lawful men, with the reeve, from each village
or manor on the royal demesne, were present, but only, it must be
remembered, in a very mean capacity—only to make a sworn inquest as to
the amount of damage done. Such inquests by the humble representatives
of the villages were quite common locally; the innovation lies in this,
that their verdict was now given in a national assembly. Directions were
issued in the King’s name from the same meeting, commanding sheriffs,
foresters, and others to observe the laws of Henry I. and to abstain
from unjust exactions, as they valued their limbs and lives.[13]
-----
Footnote 12:
Stubbs, _Const. Hist._, I. 566.
Footnote 13:
R. Wendover, III. 261-2.
-----
On 25th August, after John had set out with his mercenaries to punish by
force of arms the refusal of his northern magnates to follow him to the
Continent, as he held them bound to do in terms of their feudal
obligations, Stephen Langton held a meeting with the great men of the
south. Many bishops, abbots, priors and deans, together with some lay
magnates of the southern counties, met him at St. Paul’s, London. The
ostensible object of this assembly was to determine what use the
Archbishop should make of his power to grant partial relaxation of the
interdict still casting its blight over England—which could not be
finally lifted until the legate arrived with fuller powers. If we may
believe Roger of Wendover, more important business was transacted in the
King’s absence. Stephen reminded the magnates that John’s absolution had
been conditional on a promise of good government, and as a standard to
guide them in judging what such government implied, he produced a copy
of Henry I.’s Charter of Liberties. All present swore to “fight for
those liberties, if it were needful, even unto death.” The Archbishop
promised his help, “and a confederacy being thus made between them, the
conference was dissolved.”[14]
-----
Footnote 14:
Roger of Wendover, III. 263-6. Blackstone (_Great Charter_,
Introduction, p. vi.), makes the apposite comment that it seems
unlikely that the discovery by the Archbishop of a charter probably
already well known “should be a matter of such novelty and triumph.”
-----
Stephen Langton, however, desired a peaceable solution if possible, and
three days later we find him, after a somewhat hurried journey, at
Northampton, on the 28th of August, striving earnestly, and with
success, to avert civil war between John and the recalcitrant Crown
tenants in the north.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account