Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
fleet be opposed to only two thirds of the enemy” (B, B). The difficulty
and misunderstanding which followed seem to have sprung mainly from the
defective character of the signal book. Instead of doing as the admiral
wished, the leading ships (a) carried sail so as to reach their supposed
station abreast their numerical opposite in the order. Rodney stated
afterward that when he bore down the second time, the French fleet was
in a very extended line of battle; and that, had his orders been obeyed,
the center and rear must have been disabled before the van could have
joined.
There seems every reason to believe that Rodney’s intentions throughout
were to double on the French, as asserted. The failure sprang from the
signal book and tactical inefficiency of the fleet; for which he, having
lately joined, was not answerable. But the ugliness of his fence was so
apparent to De Guichen, that he exclaimed, when the English fleet kept
away the first time, that six or seven of his ships were gone; and sent
word to Rodney that if his signals had been obeyed he would have had him
for his prisoner.[55] A more convincing proof that he recognized the
dangerousness of his enemy is to be found in the fact that he took care
not to have the lee-gage in their subsequent encounters. Rodney’s
careful plans being upset, he showed that with them he carried all the
stubborn courage of the most downright fighter; taking his own ship
close to the enemy and ceasing only when the latter hauled off, her
foremast and mainyard gone, and her hull so damaged that she could
hardly be kept afloat.
20. SEA POWER IN THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION[56]
_Graves and De Grasse off the Chesapeake_
[Preliminary to the events narrated, the general naval situation was as
follows: The main British and French fleets, under Rodney and De Grasse,
respectively, were in the West Indies, while a small British division
was under Graves at New York, and a French squadron under De Barras was
based on Newport, R. I. The squadrons on the American coast had met in a
desultory action off the Virginia capes on March 16, 1781, after which
the French commander had returned to Newport and left the British in
control.—EDITOR.]
The way of the sea being thus open and held in force, two thousand more
English troops sailing from New York reached Virginia on the 26th of
March, and the subsequent arrival of Cornwallis in May raised the number
to seven thousand. The operations of the contending forces during the
spring and summer months, in which Lafayette commanded the Americans, do
not concern our subject. Early in August, Cornwallis, acting under
orders from Clinton, withdrew his troops into the peninsula between the
York and James rivers, and occupied Yorktown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account