Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
The English were unfortunate in all directions. Rodney, learning of De
Grasse’s departure, sent fourteen ships-of-the-line under Admiral Hood
to North America, and himself sailed for England in August, on account
of ill health. Hood, going by the direct route, reached the Chesapeake
three days before De Grasse, looked into the bay, and finding it empty
went on to New York. There he met five ships-of-the-line under Admiral
Graves, who, being senior officer, took command of the whole force and
sailed on the 31st of August for the Chesapeake, hoping to intercept De
Barras before he could join De Grasse. It was not till two days later
that Sir Henry Clinton was persuaded that the allied armies had gone
against Cornwallis, and had too far the start to be overtaken.
[Illustration: GRAVES AND DE GRASSE _5th Sept. 1781_ OFF CHESAPEAKE BAY]
Admiral Graves was painfully surprised, on making the Chesapeake, to
find anchored there a fleet which from its numbers could only be an
enemy’s. Nevertheless, he stood in to meet it, and as De Grasse got
under way, allowing his ships to be counted, the sense of numerical
inferiority—nineteen to twenty-four—did not deter the English admiral
from attacking. The clumsiness of his method, however, betrayed his
gallantry; many of his ships were roughly handled, without any advantage
being gained.[60] De Grasse, expecting De Barras, remained outside five
days, keeping the English fleet in play without coming to action; then
returning to port he found De Barras safely at anchor. Graves went back
to New York, and with him disappeared the last hope of succor that was
to gladden Cornwallis’s eyes. The siege was steadily endured, but the
control of the sea made only one issue possible, and the English forces
were surrendered October 19, 1781. With this disaster the hope of
subduing the colonies died in England. The conflict flickered through a
year longer, but no serious operations were undertaken.
... The defeat of Graves and subsequent surrender of Cornwallis did not
end the naval operations in the western hemisphere. On the contrary, one
of the most interesting tactical feats and the most brilliant victory of
the whole war were yet to grace the English flag in the West Indies; but
with the events at Yorktown the patriotic interest for Americans closes.
Before quitting that struggle for independence, it must again be
affirmed that its successful ending, at least at so early a date, was
due to the control of the sea,—to sea power in the hands of the French,
and its improper distribution by the English authorities. This assertion
may be safely rested on the authority of the one man who, above all
others, thoroughly knew the resources of the country, the temper of the
people, the difficulties of the struggle, and whose name is still the
highest warrant for sound, quiet, unfluttered good sense and patriotism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account