Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Looking at his diagram, and following his words, it will be seen that
the British lines are not formed perpendicularly to that of the enemy
(as they were at Trafalgar), but parallel to it. Starting from this
disposition, near the enemy and abreast his center, the lee line of
sixteen ships was to bear up _together_, and advance in line, not in
column (as happened at Trafalgar); their object being the twelve rear
ships of the enemy. This first move stands by itself; the action of the
weather line, and of the reserve squadron still farther to windward, are
held in suspense under the eye of the commander-in-chief, to take the
direction which the latter shall prescribe as the struggle develops. The
mere menace of such a force, just out of gunshot to windward, would be
sufficient to prevent any extensive maneuver of the unengaged enemies.
Nelson doubtless had in mind the dispositions, more than a century old,
of Tourville and De Ruyter, by which a few ships, spaced to windward of
an enemy’s van, could check its tacking, because of the raking fire to
which they would subject it. Unquestionably, he would not have kept long
in idle expectancy twenty-four ships, the number he had in mind; but
clearly also he proposed to hold them until he saw how things went with
Collingwood. Thus much time would allow, granting the position he
assumed and a reasonable breeze. His twenty-four to windward held an
absolute check over the supposed thirty-four unengaged, of the enemy.
The attack as planned, therefore, differed from that executed (1) in
that the lee line was not to advance in column, but in line, thereby
dispersing the enemy’s fire, and avoiding the terrific concentration
which crushed the leaders at Trafalgar; and (2) in that the weather
squadrons were not to attack simultaneously with the lee, but after it
had engaged, in order to permit the remedying of any mishap that might
arise in delivering the crucial blow. In both these matters of detail
the plan was better than the modification; but the latter was forced
upon Nelson by conditions beyond his control.[84]
_The Battle_
Napoleon’s commands to enter the Mediterranean reached Villeneuve on
September 27. The following day, when Nelson was joining his fleet, the
admiral acknowledged their receipt, and submissively reported his
intention to obey as soon as the wind served. Before he could do so,
accurate intelligence was received of the strength of Nelson’s force,
which the emperor had not known. Villeneuve assembled a council of war
to consider the situation, and the general opinion was adverse to
sailing; but the commander-in-chief, alleging the orders of Napoleon,
announced his determination to follow them. To this all submitted. An
event, then unforeseen by Villeneuve, precipitated his action.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account