Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
The general considerations that have been advanced are sufficient to
indicate what should have been the general plan of the war on the part
of the United States. Every war must be aggressive, or, to use the
technical term, offensive, in military character; for unless you injure
the enemy, if you confine yourself, as some of the grumblers of that day
would have it, to simple defense against his efforts, obviously he has
no inducement to yield your contention. Incidentally, however, vital
interests must be defended, otherwise the power of offense falls with
them. Every war, therefore, has both a defensive and an offensive side,
and in an effective plan of campaign each must receive due attention.
Now, in 1812, so far as general natural conditions went, the United
States was relatively weak on the sea frontier, and strong on the side
of Canada. The seaboard might, indeed, in the preceding ten years, have
been given a development of force, by the creation of an adequate navy,
which would have prevented war, by the obvious danger to British
interests involved in hostilities. But this had not been done; and
Jefferson, by his gunboat policy, building some two hundred of those
vessels, worthless unless under cover of the land, proclaimed by act as
by voice his adherence to a bare defensive. The sea frontier, therefore,
became mainly a line of defense, the utility of which primarily was, or
should have been, to maintain communication with the outside world; to
support commerce, which in turn should sustain the financial potency
that determines the issues of war.
... Such in general was the condition of the sea frontier, thrown
inevitably upon the defensive. With the passing comment that, had it
been defended as suggested [by a squadron of respectable battleships in
concentrated strength.—EDITOR], Great Britain would never have forced
the war, let us now consider conditions on the Canadian line, where
circumstances eminently favored the offensive by the United States; for
this war should not be regarded simply as a land war or a naval war, nor
yet as a war of offense and again one of defense, but as being
continuously and at all times both offensive and defensive, both land
and sea, in reciprocal influence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account