Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
accomplished the journey from Albany to Buffalo in October in six days
with ease and comfort, whereas in May it took ten of great difficulty
and distress.”[92] In the farther West the American armies, though much
impeded, advanced securely through Ohio and Indiana to the shores of
Lake Erie, and there maintained themselves in supplies sent
over-country; whereas the British at the western end of the lake,
opposite Detroit, depended wholly upon the water, although no hostile
force threatened the land line between them and Ontario. The battle of
Lake Erie, so disastrous to their cause, was forced upon them purely by
failure of food, owing to the appearance of Perry’s squadron.
... The opinion of competent soldiers on the spot, such as Craig and
Brock, in full possession of all the contemporary facts, may be accepted
explicitly as confirming the inferences which in any event might have
been drawn from the natural features of the situation. Upon Mackinac and
Detroit depended the control and quiet of the Northwestern country,
because they commanded vital points on its line of communication. Upon
Kingston and Montreal, by their position and intrinsic advantages,
rested the communication of all Canada, along and above the St.
Lawrence, with the sea power of Great Britain, whence alone could be
drawn the constant support without which ultimate defeat should have
been inevitable. Naval power, sustained upon the Great Lakes, controlled
the great line of communication between the East and West, and also
conferred upon the party possessing it the strategic advantage of
interior lines; that is, of shorter distances, both in length and time,
to move from point to point of the lake shores, close to which lay the
scenes of operations. It followed that Detroit and Michilimackinac,
being at the beginning in the possession of the United States, should
have been fortified, garrisoned, provisioned, in readiness for siege,
and placed in close communication with home, as soon as war was seen to
be imminent, which it was in December, 1811, at latest. Having in that
quarter everything to lose, and comparatively little to gain, the
country was thrown on the defensive. On the east the possession of
Montreal or Kingston would cut off all Canada above from support by the
sea, which would be equivalent to ensuring its fall. “I shall continue
to exert myself to the utmost to overcome every difficulty,” wrote
Brock, who gave such emphatic proof of energetic and sagacious exertion
in his subsequent course. “Should, however, the communication between
Montreal and Kingston be cut off, the fate of the troops in this part of
the province will be decided.”[93] “The Montreal frontier,” said the
officer selected by the Duke of Wellington to report on the defenses of
Canada, “is the most important, and at present [1826] confessedly most
vulnerable and accessible part of Canada.”[94] There, then, was the
direction for offensive operations by the United States; preferably
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account