Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
To an instructed, thoughtful, naval mind in the United States, there is
no contingency affecting the country, as interested in the navy, so
menacing as the fear of popular clamor influencing an irresolute, or
militarily ignorant, administration to divide the battleship force into
two divisions, the Atlantic and the Pacific. A determined President,
instructed in military matters, doubtless will not yield, but will
endeavor by explanation to appease apprehension and quiet outcry.
Nevertheless, the danger exists; and always will exist in proportion as
the people do not understand the simple principle that an efficient
military body depends for its effect in war—and in peace—less upon its
position than upon its concentrated force. This does not ignore
position, and its value. On the contrary, it is written with a clear
immediate recollection of Napoleon’s pregnant saying, “War is a business
of positions.” But the great captain, in the letter in which the phrase
occurs, goes on directly to instruct the marshal to whom he is writing
so to station the divisions of his corps, for purposes of supply, around
a common center, that they can unite rapidly; and can meet the enemy in
mass before he can attack any one of them, or move far from his present
position against another important French interest.
Concentration indeed, in last analysis, may be correctly defined as
being itself a choice of position; viz.: that the various corps, or
ships, shall not be some in one place, and some in others, but all in
one place. We Americans have luckily had an object lesson, not at our
own expense, but at that of an old friend. There is commonly believed to
have been little effective public opinion in Russia at the time the war
with Japan was at hand; such as did manifest itself, in the use of
dynamite against officials, seems not to have taken into consideration
international relations, military or other. But in the councils of the
Empire, however constituted, and whatever the weight of the military
element, there was shown in act an absolute disregard of principles so
simple, so obvious, and so continually enforced by precept and
experience, that the fact would be incomprehensible, had not we all
seen, in civil as in military life, that the soundest principles,
perfectly well known, fail, more frequently than not, to sustain conduct
against prepossession or inclination. That communications dominate
strategy, and that the communications of Japan in a continental war
would be by sea, were clear as daylight. That the whole navy of Russia,
united on the scene, would be sufficient, and half of it probably
insufficient, certainly hazardous, was equally plain. Yet, ship by ship,
half was assembled in the Far East, until Japan saw that this process of
division had been carried as far as suited her interests and declared
war; after which of course no Russian battleship could go forward alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account