Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
The radical disadvantage of the defensive is evident. It not only is the
enforced attitude of a weaker party, but it labors under the further
onerous uncertainty where the offensive may strike, when there is more
than one line of operation open to him, as there usually is. This tends
to entail dissemination of force. The advantages of the defensive have
been sufficiently indicated; they are essentially those of deliberate
preparation, shown in precautions of various kinds. In assuming the
defensive you take for granted the impossibility of your own permanent
advance and the ability of the enemy to present himself before your
front in superior numbers; unless you can harass him on the way and
cause loss enough to diminish the inequality. Unless such disparity
exists, you should be on the offensive. On the other hand, in the
defensive it has to be taken for granted that you have on your side a
respectable though inferior battle fleet, and a sea frontier possessing
a certain number of ports which cannot be reduced without regular
operations, in which the armed shipping can be got ready for battle, and
to which, as to a base, they can retire for refit. Without these two
elements there can be no serious defense.
10. COMMERCE-DESTROYING AND BLOCKADE[29]
It is desirable to explain here what was, and is, the particular
specific utility of operations directed toward the destruction of an
enemy’s commerce; what its bearing upon the issues of war; and how,
also, it affects the relative interests of antagonists, unequally paired
in the matter of sea power. Without attempting to determine precisely
the relative importance of internal and external commerce, which varies
with each country, and admitting that the length of transportation
entails a distinct element of increased cost upon the articles
transported, it is nevertheless safe to say that, to nations having free
access to the sea, the export and import trade is a very large factor in
national prosperity and comfort. At the very least, it increases by so
much the aggregate of commercial transactions, while the ease and
copiousness of water carriage go far to compensate for the increase of
distance. Furthermore, the public revenue of maritime states is largely
derived from duties on imports. Hence arises, therefore, a large source
of wealth, of money; and money—ready money or substantial credit—is
proverbially the sinews of war, as the War of 1812 was amply to
demonstrate. Inconvertible assets, as business men know, are a very
inefficacious form of wealth in tight times; and war is always a tight
time for a country, a time in which its positive wealth, in the shape of
every kind of produce, is of little use, unless by freedom of exchange
it can be converted into cash for governmental expenses. To this sea
commerce greatly contributes, and the extreme embarrassment under which
the United States as a nation labored in 1814 was mainly due to
commercial exclusion from the sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account