Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
In our hostilities with Spain, also, Cervera’s movement before reaching
Santiago was offensive in character, the attitude of the United States
defensive; that is, he was trying to effect something which the American
Navy was set to prevent. There being three principal Spanish ports,
Havana, Cienfuegos, and Santiago, we could not be certain for which he
would try, and should have been before two in such force that an attempt
by him would have assured a battle. We were strong enough for such a
disposition. The two ports thus to be barred were evidently Havana and
Cienfuegos. The supposed necessity for defending our northern coast left
Cienfuegos open. Had Cervera made for it, he would have reached it
before the Flying Squadron did. The need for keeping the Flying Squadron
in Hampton Roads was imaginary, but it none the less illustrates the
effect of inadequate coast defenses upon the military plan of the
nation.
The author whom I quote (Corbett, “Seven Years’ War,” Vol. I, p. 92),
who himself quotes from one of the first of authorities, Clausewitz, has
therefore immediately to qualify his maxim, thus:
“When we say that defense is a stronger form of war, _that is, that it
requires a smaller force, if soundly designed_, we are speaking, of
course, only of one certain line of operations. If we do not know the
general line of operation on which the enemy intends to attack, and so
cannot mass our force upon it, then defense is weak, because we are
compelled to distribute our force so as to be strong enough to stop the
enemy on any line of operations he may adopt.”
Manifestly, however, a force capable of being strong enough on several
lines of operation to stop an enemy possesses a superiority that should
take the offensive. In the instance just cited, of Cervera’s approach,
the American true policy of concentration would have had to yield to
distribution, between Cienfuegos and Havana. Instead of a decisive
superiority on one position, there would have been a bare equality upon
two. Granting an enemy of equal skill and training, the result might
have been one way or the other; and the only compensation would have
been that the enemy would have been so badly handled that, to use
Nelson’s phrase, he would give no more trouble that season, and the
other American division would have controlled the seas, as Togo did
after August 10, 1904. From the purely professional point of view it is
greatly to be regretted that the Spaniards and Russians showed such poor
professional aptitude.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account