Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Preparation for war, rightly understood, A falls under two
heads,—preparation and preparedness. The one is a question mainly of
material, and is constant in its action. The second involves an idea of
completeness. When, at a particular moment, preparations are completed,
one is prepared—not otherwise. There may have been made a great deal of
very necessary preparation for war without being prepared. Every
constituent of preparation may be behindhand, or some elements may be
perfectly ready, while others are not. In neither case can a state be
said to be prepared.
In the matter of preparation for war, one clear idea should be absorbed
first by every one who, recognizing that war is still a possibility,
desires to see his country ready. This idea is that, however defensive
in origin or in political character a war may be, the assumption of a
simple defensive in war is ruin. War, once declared, must be waged
offensively, aggressively. The enemy must not be fended off, but smitten
down. You may then spare him every exaction, relinquish every gain; but
till down he must be struck incessantly and remorselessly.
Preparation, like most other things, is a question both of kind and of
degree, of quality and of quantity. As regards degree, the general lines
upon which it is determined have been indicated broadly in the preceding
part of this article. The measure of degree is the estimated force which
the strongest probable enemy can bring against you, allowance being made
for clear drawbacks upon his total force, imposed by his own
embarrassments and responsibilities in other parts of the world. The
calculation is partly military, partly political, the latter, however,
being the dominant factor in the premises.
In kind, preparation is twofold,—defensive and offensive. The former
exists chiefly for the sake of the latter, in order that offense, the
determining factor in war, may put forth its full power, unhampered by
concern for the protection of the national interests or for its own
resources. In naval war, coast defense is the defensive factor, the navy
the offensive. Coast defense, when adequate, assures the naval
commander-in-chief that his base of operations—the dockyards and coal
depots—is secure. It also relieves him and his government, by the
protection afforded to the chief commercial centers, from the necessity
of considering them, and so leaves the offensive arm perfectly free.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account