Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
While England’s policy thus steadily aimed at widening and strengthening
the bases of her sway upon the ocean, the other governments of Europe
seemed blind to the dangers to be feared from her sea growth. The
miseries resulting from the overweening power of Spain in days long gone
by seemed to be forgotten; forgotten also the more recent lesson of the
bloody and costly wars provoked by the ambition and exaggerated power of
Louis XIV. Under the eyes of the statesmen of Europe there was steadily
and visibly being built up a third overwhelming power, destined to be
used as selfishly, as aggressively, though not as cruelly, and much more
successfully than any that had preceded it. This was the power of the
sea, whose workings, because more silent than the clash of arms, are
less often noted, though lying clearly enough on the surface. It can
scarcely be denied that England’s uncontrolled dominion of the seas,
during almost the whole period chosen for our subject, was by long odds
the chief among the military factors that determined the final
issue.[43] So far, however, was this influence from being foreseen after
Utrecht, that France for twelve years, moved by personal exigencies of
her rulers, sided with England against Spain; and when Fleuri came into
power in 1726, though this policy was reversed, the navy of France
received no attention, and the only blow at England was the
establishment of a Bourbon prince, a natural enemy to her, upon the
throne of the two Sicilies in 1736. When war broke out with Spain in
1739, the navy of England was in numbers more than equal to the combined
navies of Spain and France; and during the quarter of a century of
nearly uninterrupted war that followed, this numerical disproportion
increased. In these wars England, at first instinctively, afterward with
conscious purpose under a government that recognized her opportunity and
the possibilities of her great sea power, rapidly built up that mighty
colonial empire whose foundations were already securely laid in the
characteristics of her colonists and the strength of her fleets. In
strictly European affairs her wealth, the outcome of her sea power, made
her play a conspicuous part during the same period. The system of
subsidies, which began half a century before in the wars of Marlborough
and received its most extensive development half a century later in the
Napoleonic wars, maintained the efforts of her allies, which would have
been crippled, if not paralyzed, without them. Who can deny that the
government which with one hand strengthened its fainting allies on the
continent with the life-blood of money, and with the other drove its own
enemies off the sea and out of their chief possessions, Canada,
Martinique, Guadeloupe, Havana, Manila, gave to its country the foremost
rôle in European politics; and who can fail to see that the power which
dwelt in that government, with a land narrow in extent and poor in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account