Malthus, T. R. (Thomas Robert), 1766-1834; Malthusianism
with them.”[406] It was a rate of increase which he saw would double the
population in less than fifty-five years; and this doubling has really
happened. The numbers for England in 1801 were 8,892,536; and in 1851
they were 17,927,609. Malthus had not anticipated any greater changes in
manufacture and trade than those of his own day; and he clearly expected
that the rate of increase would not continue and the numbers would not
be doubled. The one thing certain was the impossibility of safe
prediction on the strength of any existing rate. A writer at the
beginning of this century prophesied the extinction of the Turkish
people in one hundred years; Sir William Petty at the end of the
seventeenth century predicted that in 1800 London would have 5,359,000
inhabitants. But the Turks are not yet extinct; London in 1800 had less
than a million of people, and has taken eighty years more to raise them
to the number in the prophecy.[407]
If prediction was difficult in the case of England, it was not less so
in the case of the other parts of the United Kingdom. The conditions of
society and industry were quite different in the three countries; and to
judge of the actual or probable growth of population in Scotland or
Ireland, we must first, as with England, clearly understand these
conditions. In the early part of this century even more than now,
Scotland[408] stood to England as the country districts of England now
stand to its great towns. Continual migration from country to town may
be said to have been its normal state; and the largest towns were in
England. The change from a militant and feudal to an industrial society
was nowhere so marked as in Scotland after the Union, and especially
after the rebellion of 1745. The hereditary judgeships of highland
chiefs were swept away; the relation between chief and clansmen became
the unromantic relation of landlord and tenant. The displacement of
household work by the factory system, and of hand labour by machinery,
crowded the great towns of Scotland at the expense of the country
districts; and crowded the great towns and manufacturing districts of
England at the expense of Scotland. The flood of North Britons into
England was not of Bute’s making; and it was greatest after and not
before the Peace of Paris, although under that peace and a stable
government the farming, the manufacturing, the banking, and the foreign
trading of Scotland itself had grown great enough (it might have seemed)
to employ the whole population at home. Cotton manufacture, which on the
whole is the typical industry of these latter days, was peculiarly
English.[409] Sheep-farming at home and cotton-spinning in England
combined to depopulate the Scotch highlands and much of the lowlands.
The highlands, with their strongly-marked physical features and strictly
limited industrial possibilities, were somewhat in the position of
Norway. In the highlands proper there were no mineral riches; there were
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account