Mammals of Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado — John Shaqi
Mammals of Mesa Verde National Park, ColoradoAnderson, Sydney
Science
Mammals of Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado
Anderson, Sydney
Mammals -- Colorado -- Mesa Verde National Park
In 1935, C.W. Quaintance took special notice of porcupines because of
the possibility, then being considered, of their being detrimental to
habitat conditions thought to be favorable to wild turkeys. Porcupines
were suspected of killing ponderosa pine, which occurred in only a few
places, and which was thought to be necessary for wild turkeys.
Porcupines were recorded as follows: one found dead on the road at the
North Rim on March 16; one killed in oak brush along the North Rim; one
killed between April 15 and May 15; oak brush damaged by porcupines in
Soda Canyon below the well; one seen on July 4 on the Poole Canyon
Trail; one seen at the foot of the Mesa on June 26; one seen by Lloyd
White in Moccasin Canyon on June 27; and one seen by Mrs. Sharon Spencer
on July 1 in Prater Canyon. After four months on the Mesa Verde,
Quaintance concluded that there were not so many porcupines as had been
expected and that there were more ponderosa pines than had been
expected.
In 1946, Donald A. Spencer began a study of porcupines on the Mesa Verde
and in 1958 deposited, in the University of Colorado Library, his
results in manuscript form as a dissertation in partial fulfillment of
the requirements for a higher degree ("Porcupine population fluctuations
in past centuries revealed by dendrochronology," 108 numbered and 13
unnumbered pages, 39 figures, and 13 tables). Dendrochronology, or the
dating of trees by studying their rings, is a technique widely used in
the southwest by archeologists, climatologists, and others. Spencer
found that porcupines damage trees in a characteristic manner, and that
damage to a pinyon pine was evident as long as the tree lived. By dating
approximately 2000 scars and plotting the year for each scar, Spencer
observed three peaks since 1865; these were in about 1885, 1905, and
1935. The increase and decrease each time were at about the same rate.
The study did not yield precise population estimates. Some porcupines
were destroyed but Spencer is of the opinion that the decline that came
in following years was independent of the control measures. Spencer
thinks that activities of porcupines on the Mesa Verde are a major
factor in maintaining a forest cover of relatively young trees, and also
in preventing invasion of trees into areas of brush.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account