Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human ActionMarsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Science
Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action
Marsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Conservation of natural resources; Human geography; Nature -- Effect of human beings on; Physical geography
We need not go far back to reach a period when, in all that portion of
the North American continent which has been occupied by British
colonization, the geographical elements very nearly balanced and
compensated each other. At the commencement of the seventeenth century,
the soil, with insignificant exceptions, was covered with forests;[16]
and whenever the Indian, in consequence of war or the exhaustion of the
beasts of the chase, abandoned the narrow fields he had planted and the
woods he had burned over, they speedily returned, by a succession of
herbaceous, arborescent, and arboreal growths, to their original state.
Even a single generation sufficed to restore them almost to their
primitive luxuriance of forest vegetation.[17] The unbroken forests had
attained to their maximum density and strength of growth, and, as the
older trees decayed and fell, they were succeeded by new shoots or
seedlings, so that from century to century no perceptible change seems
to have occurred in the wood, except the slow, spontaneous succession of
crops. This succession involved no interruption of growth, and but
little break in the "boundless contiguity of shade;" for, in the
husbandry of nature, there are no fallows. Trees fall singly, not by
square roods, and the tall pine is hardly prostrate, before the light
and heat, admitted to the ground by the removal of the dense crown of
foliage which had shut them out, stimulate the germination of the seeds
of broad-leaved trees that had lain, waiting this kindly influence,
perhaps for centuries. Two natural causes, destructive in character,
were, indeed, in operation in the primitive American forests, though, in
the Northern colonies, at least, there were sufficient compensations;
for we do not discover that any considerable permanent change was
produced by them. I refer to the action of beavers and of fallen trees
in producing bogs,[18] and of smaller animals, insects, and birds, in
destroying the woods. Bogs are less numerous and extensive in the
Northern States of the American union, because the natural inclination
of the surface favors drainage; but they are more frequent, and cover
more ground, in the Southern States, for the opposite reason.[19] They
generally originate in the checking of watercourses by the falling of
timber, or of earth and rocks, across their channels. If the impediment
thus created is sufficient to retain a permanent accumulation of water
behind it, the trees whose roots are overflowed soon perish, and then by
their fall increase the obstruction, and, of course, occasion a still
wider spread of the stagnating stream. This process goes on until the
water finds a new outlet, at a higher level, not liable to similar
interruption. The fallen trees not completely covered by water are soon
overgrown with mosses; aquatic and semi-aquatic plants propagate
themselves, and spread until they more or less completely fill up the
space occupied by the water, and the surface is gradually converted from
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account