Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilizationAlexander, F. Matthias (Frederick Matthias)
Science
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization
I asked him to lift his arm. “I can’t.” “But please try.” He did so and
the cause of his trouble was immediately apparent to me. He was using
the muscular mechanisms of the arm and neck in such a way as to place a
severe strain on the injured muscle, such a strain indeed as would have
been harmful to a normal arm and which caused him intense pain. For
instance, he was exerting force sufficient to lift a sack of flour and
he _looked_ as if he had been called upon for such an exertion! He was
stiffening all the muscles which he should have relaxed, and was
altogether acting as the subconsciously controlled person of to-day does
habitually act when something unusual occurs. To put the matter in the
terms of my thesis, he acted in accordance with a subconscious guiding
influence which had long since lost the standard of accuracy of instinct
possessed by his early ancestors, whilst nothing had been given to or
cultivated by him in his civilised state to compensate for its loss. The
“cure” was so simple as to appear ludicrous. I had diagnosed that the
subconsciously stiffened muscles were the cause of the trouble. My
efforts were devoted to obtaining the correct action of the arm with the
minimum of tension. This was done by manipulation and by giving him
guiding orders which brought about the correct use of the parts
concerned. Within ten minutes he was able to lift his arm with very
little pain and he resumed his professional work at once and without
relapse. Note that the relaxing was not brought about by a preliminary
order to relax, an action which entailed processes of which he had no
true consciousness and over which therefore he had no control. Note also
that this demonstration is much more effective for the treatment of
similar later accidents and for general self-development and control,
than any hypnotic “suggestion” that there was no pain.[16]
I do not deny, for it would be against the evidence, that the healers do
contrive to remove pain; but apart from the danger of removing mere
symptoms (that is, removing nature’s danger signals and leaving the
danger untouched), their methods have the obvious limitation of being
repugnant to many, and have fallen into some discredit amongst those who
are by no means amongst the least capable, accomplished, and thoughtful
human types.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account